Author
Listed:
- Hellstern, Laura
- Hess, Sebastian
- Gebhardt, Beate
Abstract
Agricultural systems are facing the need to transform towards more sustainable production practices. Although organic farming emerged decades ago as a model for sustainable farm systems, conventional farmers are increasingly seeking to adopt practices that address specific sustainability issues. This paper assesses conventional and organic farmers' self-perceptions of their implementation of sustainable activities, how these self-perceptions differ between the two farming types, and the interconnections among sustainable practices. An online survey (n = 234) was conducted to capture German farmers´ self-perceptions in 2022. The open answers on sustainability practices were analysed using qualitative content and semantic network analysis. The qualitative content analysis revealed that organic farms primarily view their organic farming practices as sustainable practices themselves, while conventional farms mostly contribute to diverse cultural landscapes and optimised nutrient management. The semantic networks within the statements of the organic farms were more strongly interconnected compared to the network of statements from conventional farms. This signals that a common perception about how sustainable farming can be defined is more developed and more coherent among organic farmers. Respondents from both farm groups are making efforts to become more sustainable. However, organic farming seems to show limited dynamics in adopting new practices, while conventional farms seem to lack a systems-based perception of sustainability. In future, both farming types should strengthen efforts to learn from each other. These findings have important implications for designing agricultural policies that target a more sustainable agricultural system overall.
Suggested Citation
Hellstern, Laura & Hess, Sebastian & Gebhardt, Beate, 2026.
"Self-Perception of Sustainable Practices: A Comparison Between Conventional and Organic Farmers,"
German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 75, November.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:gjagec:417299
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.417299
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gjagec:417299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iahubde.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.