IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/gjagec/284961.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Inspection Strategies to Enforce Organic Farming Standards

Author

Listed:
  • Lippert, Christian
  • Zorn, Alexander
  • Dabbert, Stephan

Abstract

The organic market depends on an effective and efficient certification system. Control bodies or authorities are pivotal to this system. From a social point of view, our objective is to theoretically optimize inspection strategies. For this, sanctions and inspection frequencies have to be implemented in a way that the net social damage arising from farmers’ non-compliance with an organic standard will be minimized. In scenarios that combine different kinds of social damages, fines and compliance cost distributions for an assumed set of farms we use Monte Carlo simulations to model farmers’ non-compliance and resulting social damages. Depending on potential reputation losses and com-pliance cost variability among farms we identify different adequate control frequencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Lippert, Christian & Zorn, Alexander & Dabbert, Stephan, 2016. "Optimizing Inspection Strategies to Enforce Organic Farming Standards," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 65(01), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:gjagec:284961
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.284961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/284961/files/2_Lippert.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.284961?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gjagec:284961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iahubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.