IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/gazdal/99087.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A földbirtok-politika választ igénylő kérdései

Author

Listed:
  • Kapronczai, Istvan

Abstract

A kérdések széles területet ölelnek fel, ami folytatható a földvédelemmel, a kör-nyezetvédelemmel, a földadó kérdésével stb. A politikának – kompromisszumokkal és megegyezéssel – mielőbb lépnie kell, mert a rendezett birtokviszonyok növelik a földárat, élénkítik a termőföld iránti keresletet. Az emelkedő árak ugyanakkor bővítik a földkínálatot, végeredményben élénkül az egész földpiac. Ez a leghatékonyabb eszköz a termőfölddel kapcsolatos spekulációk visszaszorítására. Van-e azonban esély a megegyezésre? Politikai síkon aligha! Sőt az agrárközgazdász szakma is meglehetősen megosztott a birtok, a föld kérdésében, hisz körein¬ken belül is hatnak az érdekek, a megcsontosodott előítéletek. Mégis szükség van egy szakmai vitára, egy őszinte véleménycserére, amely körvonalazhat egy – kompromisszumokkal gazdagon körülágyazott – megegyezést. Valamennyiünknek tudomásul kell vennie, hogy a magyar agrárgazdaságnak rendelkeznie kell egy világos jövőképpel, ha úgy tetszik stratégiával. Ennek pedig alfája és ómegája a hosszú távon sta¬bilnak remélt birtokpolitika. E cikk azért íródott, hogy felvessen kérdéseket, leírjon – még ha nem is minden tekintetben kiérlelt – megállapításokat, ezzel lehetőséget adjon a hozzászólásra, a vitára. Hasznos lenne, ha az agrárközgazdász szakma kifejtené véleményét olyan fontos birtokpolitikai kérdésekkel kapcsolatban, mint például a földtulajdon, földbérlet, földpiac, a föld öröklésének szabályozása, az állami szerepvállalás és ennek eszközrendszere. -------------------------------------------- The questions of land ownership and the relevant policy have been highly topical issues for the agricultural professionals ever since Hungary’s accession to the European Union. Articles and presentations repeatedly state that we should prepare for the challenges to be brought about by the liberalisation of land sale. What will happen when the derogation barring foreigners from acquiring land expires? What will happen if business partnerships are no longer prohibited from purchasing land? We have seven years to answer these challenges, and six have already passed. During this time, the problems were raised multiple times but nothing else was done! Political players have come to a stalemate. This is the 24th hour. Early in the autumn, the new government will need to propose a land bill to the Parliament – preferably based on consensus(!) – which offers protection from the undesired effects of making land sale and purchase arrangements conform to Community standards. Is there a chance that an agreement can be reached, though? Hardly likely among politicians! What is more, the community of agricultural economists is also rather divided on the issue of land, as our community is also affected by interests and ingrained prejudices. Still, a professional debate and an honest exchange of opinions is necessary, and may outline a potential agreement supported by a wide range of compromises. We all must realize that Hungarian agriculture needs to have a clear vision, or strategy, if you like. This essentially requires a land ownership policy which is intended to be stable for a long time to come. This article is intended to raise questions and offer observations – even though they might not all be perfectly polished – which prompt responses and engender a debate.

Suggested Citation

  • Kapronczai, Istvan, 2010. "A földbirtok-politika választ igénylő kérdései," GAZDÁLKODÁS: Scientific Journal on Agricultural Economics, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 54(02), pages 1-11.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:gazdal:99087
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.99087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/99087/files/KapronczaiI_2010_2_.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.99087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gazdal:99087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtkrfhu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.