Author
Listed:
- Goda Pál
- Hamza Eszter
- Mezei Katalin
- Rácz Katalin
Abstract
The policy importance of rural development has been increasing in both the European Union and Hungary since the turn of the millennium. This is supported by the fact that in June 2021 the European Commission formulated a vision for stronger, connected, resilient and prosperous rural areas and communities by 2040, which it intends to achieve by adopting an EU-level Rural Development Action Plan, by establishing a Rural Pact mobilizing a wide range of EU, national, regional and local actors, and by using previously unused rural development solutions. The appreciation of rural development policy in Hungary is indicated by the fact that in the 2021-2027 programming period, this is the only development policy area where the level of national co-financing for EU support is increasing significantly compared to the previous period, from 17% to 80%. Based on this, our study reviews the changing role of rural development in time and space, the main changes in the system of objectives and instruments, and the financing background in order to ensure that the EU and national rural development resources available in the next programming period can further promote the development of rural areas. Our analysis points out that in order to establish a rural development policy aimed at the long-term development of rural areas, it is inevitable to redefine the concept of rural areas, to review the EU and domestic delimitation methodology of rural areas, and to renew the data collection and evaluation systems, methodologies, and theories that enable the monitoring of the results and effects of rural development interventions in order to establish a development policy with an integrated approach that focuses more on the needs of the countryside and its environment than before.
Suggested Citation
Goda Pál & Hamza Eszter & Mezei Katalin & Rácz Katalin, .
"A vidékfejlesztés helye és szerepe a fejlesztéspolitikában,"
GAZDÁLKODÁS: Scientific Journal on Agricultural Economics, Karoly Robert University College, vol. 66(06).
Handle:
RePEc:ags:gazdal:368255
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.368255
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gazdal:368255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtkrfhu.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.