Author
Abstract
The transformation oj general economic conditions, the uncertainties of the Common Market and its joint agricultural policy, and the inadequacy of the descriptions of the past combine to turn any longterm projection of farm production into a very risky exercise. It may seem rather arbitrary to limit this work to forescasts concerning land utilization and crop production alone, now that the processing of plant production into animal products is taking a leading part. Crop rotations bring an important element of rigidity into crop production while there is the technical possi~ bility of a wide choice in animal production. For lack valid \nowledge of the laws of supply, the longterm evolution (here 1975) of land use can only be outlined by analysting trends; this method is not very satisfactory since its logical bases are weakThe general impression of this imperfect work is one of stability. A great inertia appears and nothing makes us suppose that it is disappearing. This inertia is related to both agricultural and economic constraints and to farm structures. A coherent projection can not be realised at once and only for plant production. As separate projections are drawn up for animal productions, successive consistancy checks can be applied: fodder balance sheet, foreign trade, income oj farmers. The use o/ these checks implies necessarily progressive repetitions and rectifications which have lead us to the notion of rigidity of the trends. Several projection attempts have been carried out for France. The results differ when a single product is considered, but on an aggregate level the consistancy is quite good. In some cases, logistic growth curves or expotential functions are applied to the analysis of time series. More theoretical reflexion would be needed in order to give greater justification to this technique.
Suggested Citation
Dumard, Jean, 1965.
"Vue prospective sur la répartition du territoire agricole français en 1975,"
Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 65.
Handle:
RePEc:ags:ersfer:350442
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.350442
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:350442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sferrea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.