IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/eeaeje/258849.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Indicators of ICBE in Private Higher Education and Health in Addis Ababa in the Post 1991 Period

Author

Listed:
  • Tenkir Bonger
  • Gezahegn Ayele
  • Dejene Aredo

Abstract

This article is about institutional development around Investment Climate and the Business Environment [ICBE] in the establishment and growth of segments of the vital two social services - private higher education [PHE] and private health, in Addis Abeba, Ethiopia in the post 1991 period. ICBE encompasses aspects of institutions as they relate specifically to the start up, growth, development and performance or otherwise of businesses and their capacity to drive the pace of economic and social progress. While the broad objective of the study has been to gauge progress in this arena and compare levels and directions of development, the specific objectives of the study was to develop parameters of performance indicators, gauge the on-going process as perceived by the market participants, derive issues for further fine tunings of ICBE, policy and serve as a baseline for further study To meet the objectives of shedding light on the on-going ICBE process, apart from desk research, the Data Collection Team interviewed 424 respondents including the managers and staff of private higher education [PHE] and private health service providers, the direct beneficiaries of the social services [employers, current students, graduate alumni and patients], the indirect beneficiaries [staff and parents] and the regulatory authorities [education and health bureaus of the City Government of Addis Abeba]. Partly as a result of improved ICBE, noticeable positive changes in governance, expansion in private higher education [PHE] and private health provision, efficiency gains, more effectiveness in the physical and social infrastructure are reported. Moreover, there are trends towards improved regional & gender equity, accountability in PHE and health delivery services, some levels of innovativeness and development and sustainability. Notwithstanding these, the absolute quality and standard of education and health provision leave a lot to be desired. The noticeable achievements have been attained with some challenges which need to be addressed in the forthcoming fine tuning of ICBE improvement policies and institutional engineering. Genuine and effective partnership between Government, the private sector and employers need to be remodeled with a certain level of autonomy for each. Government needs autonomy to ensure that its social goals are not entirely subsumed by the profit objectives of PHE and private health firms. The latter require autonomy to tailor their services in order to meet the specific demand of the market. The ultimate beneficiaries of the process, employers and students can enrich the institutional packaging through bringing in their up to date need in the state of the art and the content of education.

Suggested Citation

  • Tenkir Bonger & Gezahegn Ayele & Dejene Aredo, 2012. "Performance Indicators of ICBE in Private Higher Education and Health in Addis Ababa in the Post 1991 Period," Ethiopian Journal of Economics, Ethiopian Economics Association, vol. 20(1), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eeaeje:258849
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.258849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/258849/files/Tenkir%20Bonger%2C%20Gezahegn%20Ayele%20and%20Dejene%20Aredo_Performance%20Indicators%20of%20Icbe%20in%20Private%20Higher%20Education%20and%20Health%20in%20A%20Ain%20the%20Post%201991%20Period.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.258849?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eeaeje:258849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eeaa2ea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.