IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/eeaeje/252974.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public policy Markets and Technical progress in the Grain plough Culture

Author

Listed:
  • Taye, Mengistae

Abstract

Based on an inter-activity analysis of a village economy of the grain - plough culture of Ethiopia, this paper is a critique of some of the premises of current rural development programmers in the country and approaches to reforms in agrarian policy Contrary to these premises, the paper argues, final demand injections may be superior to transfer injections as means of raising the incomes or the marketable surplus of rural economies in the culture. Final demand injections may also be more effective in those terms when directed at home activities rather than farming and at traditionally less traded grain types rather than those observed as the main traditional exports of the economy. Furthermore, it is a strong possibility that the same injections are a viable substitute to projects of technological intervention should these be not feasible in a locality. The agronomic bas characterizing such projects at the moment also seems to be unjustified. Results supporting the case for final demand injections imply that technological interventions may be more effective when directed at home activities rather than farm activities and at less known crops of a rural economy rather than at traditional major "exports "

Suggested Citation

  • Taye, Mengistae, 1992. "Public policy Markets and Technical progress in the Grain plough Culture," Ethiopian Journal of Economics, Ethiopian Economics Association, vol. 1(1), pages 104-104.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eeaeje:252974
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.252974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/252974/files/Taye%20Mengistae%20%20Public%20policy%20Markets%20and%20Technical%20progress%20in%20the%20Grain%20plough.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.252974?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eeaeje:252974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eeaa2ea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.