IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/eaaeac/97356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Equilibrio de un oligopolio con empresa dominante: Una aplicación al mercado de la carne de cerdo en Chile

Author

Listed:
  • Marchant, Ricardo

Abstract

The production of meat pork has experienced a significant growth between 1975 and 2004. The base of this expansion is the concentration that exhibits this industry. In this study, the power of monopoly in the context of an oligopolical market with dominant firm of the Stackelberg type is estimated. The estimation of monopoly is made indirectly through the estimation of the elasticity of residual demand of the dominant company, under diverse levels of participation of the market. A system of equations of supply and demand of pork meat, applied to the indicated period, is used. A market power that evolves was obtained in direct form with the quota of market of the reference company, been of equal levels from 0.2% to 18.2%. One concludes that, according to the available antecedents, the power of monopoly of the dominant firm in 2000, reached 7%.

Suggested Citation

  • Marchant, Ricardo, 2006. "Equilibrio de un oligopolio con empresa dominante: Una aplicación al mercado de la carne de cerdo en Chile," Economi­a Agraria (Revista Economia Agraria), Agrarian Economist Association (AEA), Chile, vol. 10, pages 1-10.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaaeac:97356
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.97356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/97356/files/Marchant.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.97356?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Industrial Organization; Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaaeac:97356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaagea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.