IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/bdbjaf/200336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical Efficiency Of Participatory And Non Participatory Crop Producers: An Evaluation Of Icm Project

Author

Listed:
  • Sumy, M C
  • Rashid, M H A
  • Miah, T H

Abstract

This study examines technical efficiency of participatory and non-participatory resource-poor farmers of integrated crops management (ICM) project in the north-west region of Bangladesh. Sixty farmers of which 30 from participatory and another 30 from non-participatory group were randomly selected from six purposively selected villages of Kurigram Sadar Upazila of Kurigram district. ICM project participatory farmers received higher net returns than the non-participatory farmers from selected crop production. Participatory farmers were technically more efficient than non-participatory farmers. Higher level of education and larger farm size were found to contribute in reducing technical inefficiency of T. aman and MV boro producing farmers. Getting membership status of non-participatory farmers' was suggested to be an important factor in removing technical inefficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Sumy, M C & Rashid, M H A & Miah, T H, 2004. "Technical Efficiency Of Participatory And Non Participatory Crop Producers: An Evaluation Of Icm Project," Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, vol. 27(1), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:bdbjaf:200336
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.200336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/200336/files/Resear_01%20Vol-XXVII-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.200336?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:bdbjaf:200336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/febaubd.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.