IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/93450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation on Development Level of Rural Circular Economy in Hebei Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Ping
  • Sun, Wen-sheng

Abstract

According to availability of rural data, and the actual situation of economic development in different areas, 1 first grade index, 2 grade indices and 20 third grade indices are selected to establish the measurement index system of circular economic development level in rural areas. According to the relevant data, standardized processing of data is conducted. Evaluation on circular economic level in Hebei Province by Factor Analysis indicates that comprehensive score of Shijiazhuang, Qinghuangdao and Tangshan Cities is the highest, that of Xingtai, Handan, Langfang, Baoding, Cangzhou Cities is at a medium level, and that of Hengshui, Chengde and Zhangjiakou is the lowest. Meanwhile, cluster analysis on data after standardization shows that Handan, Baoding, Qinhuangdao, Xingtai, Langfang, Cangzhou and Hengshui belong to the first class; Shijiazhuang and Tangshan belong to the second class; and Zhangjiakou and Chengde belong to the third class. Thus, we can conclude that rural circular economic status in Hebei Province is determined by the proximity of geography and landscape feature. Finally, countermeasures are put forward to realize the harmonious development of rural economy, society and environment and to promote the process of new socialist countryside construction, such as increasing governments’ input in construction of rural circular economy, promoting the development of rural circular economy from the aspect of industrial policy, promoting the construction of rural circular economic market in adjacent areas, and implementing mandatory public participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Ping & Sun, Wen-sheng, 2009. "Evaluation on Development Level of Rural Circular Economy in Hebei Province, China," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 1(11-12), pages 1-5, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:93450
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.93450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/93450/files/aar11.12-g.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.93450?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:93450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.