IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/317726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Antibiotic Pollution in Soil of Vegetable Base in Yangling District

Author

Listed:
  • LI, Guoxin
  • CUI, Lihui
  • LIU, Yingsha

Abstract

[Objectives] To evaluate the pollution status of antibiotics in the soil of vegetable bases in Yangling District. [Methods] The contents of 19 antibiotics in 4 categories of quinolones, tetracyclines, sulfonamides and macrolides in soil samples from 20 bases were detected and analyzed using HPLC-MS/MS. [Results] The quinolones, sulfonamides and tetracyclines were all detected in 100% of soil samples, and the detection rate of macrolides was 62%. The average contents of the four antibiotics from high to low were quinolones (51.76 μg/kg) >tetracyclines (12.77 μg/kg)> sulfonamides (1.14 μg/kg) >macrolides (0.28 μg/kg), and norfloxacin, oxytetracycline, sulfamethazine and erythromycin were the main contents, respectively. According to the trigger value of ecological toxic effect of antibiotics in soil (100 μg/kg) proposed by the Steering Committee of the International Coordinating Committee for Veterinary Medicine (VICH), the contents of the four classes of antibiotics in the soil of the study area were all lower than the trigger value, indicating a small ecological risk. [Conclusions] Compared with other domestic research reports, the vegetable bases in this study area are also at a relatively low level of antibiotic pollution.

Suggested Citation

  • LI, Guoxin & CUI, Lihui & LIU, Yingsha, 2021. "Evaluation of Antibiotic Pollution in Soil of Vegetable Base in Yangling District," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 13(11), November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:317726
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.317726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/317726/files/Evaluation%20of%20Antibiotic%20Pollution%20in%20Soil%20of%20Vegetable%20Base%20in%20Yangling%20District.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.317726?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:317726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.