IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/317717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Villagers’ Satisfaction Evaluation of Rural “Toilet Revolution” in Qinghai Province: A Case Study of Huzhu Tu Autonomous County

Author

Listed:
  • LIU, Xiaoming

Abstract

With the effect of rural toilet improvement and villagers’ satisfaction as the evaluation targets, the evaluation index system was constructed by mastering the actual situation of rural toilet improvement in Huzhu County, including villagers’ acceptability of rural toilets, construction of toilets after improvement, treatment methods and effects of fecal sewage, management of toilet equipment after toilet improvement. The indexes were assigned with weights by expert scoring, and the evaluation model of the effect of rural toilet improvement in Huzhu County was established by entropy weight method and fuzzy evaluation analysis method. The result is of great significance to the follow-up management and protection of rural toilets.

Suggested Citation

  • LIU, Xiaoming, 2021. "Villagers’ Satisfaction Evaluation of Rural “Toilet Revolution” in Qinghai Province: A Case Study of Huzhu Tu Autonomous County," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 13(11), November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:317717
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.317717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/317717/files/Villagers%E2%80%99%20Satisfaction%20Evaluation%20of%20Rural%20%E2%80%9CToilet%20Revolution%E2%80%9D%20in%20Qinghai%20Province%3A%20A%20Case%20Study%20of%20Huzhu%20Tu%20Autonomous%20County.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.317717?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:317717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.