IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/310160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality Evaluation of Threshing and Redrying Process Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

Author

Listed:
  • GUO, Xiaohan
  • TANG, Chaohua
  • TAN, Jing
  • WU, Qiuguo
  • XIE, Bowen
  • CHEN, Zhuangyu

Abstract

Improving the stability of the homogenization process to achieve the homogeneity of tobacco products is one of important targets for the redrying industry. According to the specification for threshing and redrying process, a total of 14 indicators in three categories that affect the quality of the threshing and redrying process were selected. Using analytic hierarchy process, combined with expert experiences, a judgment matrix was constructed to conduct consistency test. The weights of indices in production were obtained. This will help in evaluating the actual production quality, finding the weak links of process and adjusting the parameters of the corresponding links in a targeted manner, thereby improving the quality of production process.

Suggested Citation

  • GUO, Xiaohan & TANG, Chaohua & TAN, Jing & WU, Qiuguo & XIE, Bowen & CHEN, Zhuangyu, 2020. "Quality Evaluation of Threshing and Redrying Process Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 12(12), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:310160
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.310160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/310160/files/Quality%20Evaluation%20of%20Threshing%20and%20Redrying%20Process%20Based%20on%20Analytic%20Hierarchy%20Process.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.310160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:310160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.