IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/304133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Partial Replacement of Chemical Fertilizer by Bio-organic Fertilizer Kunyijian on Yield and Quality of Tobacco Leaves

Author

Listed:
  • LI, Folin
  • LU, Bingbing
  • YANG, Lina
  • YANG, Ronghui
  • QIAN, Facong
  • XU, Xingyang
  • LI, Jie

Abstract

To explore the application effect of bio-organic fertilizer Kunyijian in flue-cured tobacco and provide scientific basis for its application in production, a plot trial was conducted with K326, a flue-cured tobacco variety, in the Science and Technology Test Base of Xundian County, Yunnan. Taking local fertilizer consumption (control 1) and 70% local fertilizer consumption (control 2) as controls, the following replacement groups were designed: under uniformly replacement 70% local fertilizer consumption, (1) organic fertilizer: microbial agent = 80 : 1(kg), + 600 kg/ha, + 900 kg/ha, + 1 200 kg/ha, + 1 500 kg/ha Kunyijian; (2) organic fertilizer: microbial agent = 40 : 1(kg), + 900 kg/ha Kunyijian. The results show that in the treatment of 70% local fertilizer consumption + 1 200 kg/ha Kunyijian [organic fertilizer: microbial agent = 80 : 1(kg)], the comprehensive performance of flue-cured tobacco was significantly better than that in the control groups, the yield of tobacco leaves reached 2 237.1 kg/ha, the output value was 45 505.2 yuan/ha, and the average price of the tobacco leaves was 20.53 yuan/kg. The performance of flue-cured tobacco in the treatment of 70% local fertilizer consumption + 1 500 kg/ha Kunyijian ranked second. The performance of other fertilization treatments was not good, but it did not differ significantly from that of control 1. In terms of chemical composition of tobacco leaves, partial replacement of chemical fertilizer by bio-organic fertilizer Kunyijian, was beneficial to increase the sugar content and reduce the nicotine and total nitrogen contents in tobacco leaves, especially the treatment of 70% local fertilizer consumption + 900 kg/ha Kunyijian (organic fertilizer : microbial agent = 80 kg: 1 kg), and it was also beneficial to increase the chlorine content in tobacco leaves, especially the treatment of 70% local fertilizer consumption + 1 500 kg/ha Kunyijian [organic fertilizer: microbial agent = 80 : 1(kg)]. Therefore, it is feasible to use the bio-organic fertilizer Kunyijian to replace 30% of chemical fertilizer in tobacco production. The rate is recommended to be 900- 1 500 kg/ha [organic fertilizer: microbial agent = 80 : 1(kg)]. It is suggested to further strengthen the demonstration and promotion of Kunyijian.

Suggested Citation

  • LI, Folin & LU, Bingbing & YANG, Lina & YANG, Ronghui & QIAN, Facong & XU, Xingyang & LI, Jie, 2020. "Effects of Partial Replacement of Chemical Fertilizer by Bio-organic Fertilizer Kunyijian on Yield and Quality of Tobacco Leaves," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 12(03), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:304133
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.304133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/304133/files/Effects%20of%20Partial%20Replacement%20of%20Chemical%20Fertilizer%20by%20Bio-organic%20Fertilizer%20Kunyijian%20on%20Yield%20and%20Quality%20of%20Tobacco%20Leaves%20.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.304133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:304133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.