IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/299746.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variation Diagnosis and Regional Comparison of Different Intensity of Rainfalls and Their Contribution to Total Rainfall in China in the Context of Global Warming

Author

Listed:
  • KONG, Feng

Abstract

Using the data of 545 meteorological stations in 1961-2015, according to the rainfall intensity classification standard issued by the China Meteorological Administration, the rainfall events were divided into six types: light rain, moderate rain, heavy rain, torrential rain, downpour and heavy downpour. The latter three were recorded as total torrential rain, and all the six were recorded as the total rainfall. In terms of the interannual rainfall and rainy days, the whole China was regarded as an object. Firstly, the annual rainfall and rainy day of different intensity of rainfalls of 545 stations in 1961-2015 were calculated. Then, the variation trend of rainfall and rainy days was calculated. Finally, the variation trend of contribution of different intensity of rainfalls and rainy days to total rainfall and rainy days were diagnosed. It obtained the following results. (i) The light rain in China was declining from 1961 to 2015, and the trend values of light rain and rainy days were -411.44 mm/yr and -136.99 d/yr, respectively. Heavy rain and total heavy rainfall showed an increasing trend, with rainfall and rainy day trends of 127.02 and 463.94 mm/yr and 7.93 and 4.24 d/yr, respectively. The total rainfall showed a “hockey” phenomenon of “first rise, then decline”, and the trend values of rainfall and rainy days were 204.29 mm/yr and -95.81 d/yr, respectively. Except the northern region, the rainfall in most parts of China was dominated by increasing trends and was moving towards extremes. (ii) In terms of rainfall contribution rate, the contribution of light rain to total rainfall showed a declining trend, and the trend values of rainfall and rainy day contribution were both -0.11%/yr. The contribution of other intensity rainfalls to total rainfall showed an increasing trend. The contribution of torrential rain to the total torrential rain showed a declining trend. The contribution trends of rainfall and rainy days were -0.06% and -0.03%/yr, respectively. The contribution of downpour and heavy downpour to total torrential rain showed an increasing trend, indicating the intensity of torrential rain in China is increasing. Although the contribution rate of different intensity of rainfalls to total rainfall was different in different areas of China, the contribution rate of heavy rainfall to total rainfall in most areas showed an increasing trend. (iii) Through comparing the rainfall and rainy days of six different intensity of rainfalls, it can be found that China's heavy rainfall events are increasing and the rainfall intensity is developing towards extremes.

Suggested Citation

  • KONG, Feng, 2019. "Variation Diagnosis and Regional Comparison of Different Intensity of Rainfalls and Their Contribution to Total Rainfall in China in the Context of Global Warming," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 11(08), August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:299746
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.299746
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/299746/files/Variation%20Diagnosis%20and%20Regional%20Comparison%20of%20Different%20Intensity%20of%20Rainfalls%20and%20Their%20Contribution%20to%20Total%20Rainfall%20in%20China%20in%20the%20Context%20of%20Global%20Warming.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.299746?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:299746. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.