IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/271229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Combined Application of Organic Fertilizer and Chemical Fertilizer in Different Ratios on Growth, Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco

Author

Listed:
  • LIANG Bing
  • HUANG Kun
  • FU Yali
  • LI Hongguang
  • WANG Chi
  • ZHONG Xiaotian
  • LU Qinghua
  • HU Chengxiao

Abstract

The effect of different ratio of organic and inorganic fertilizers on the growth and the yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco was studied. Using randomized blocks design, the data of the test materials K326 were analyzed by using variance analysis, significance test and other methods. The release efficiency of organic fertilizer in the soil was slower, and the effect of organic fertilizer on the growth of tobacco plants was worse than that of chemical fertilizers, and under 25% organic fertilizer+75% chemical fertilizer treatment, the quality of the flue-cured tobacco was good. Under the treatment of 50% organic fertilizer+50% chemical fertilizer, the production of flue-cured tobacco was high and the ratio of first-class tobacco was high. It is suggested that the organic fertilizer application ratio should be 25%-50% in the agricultural production.

Suggested Citation

  • LIANG Bing & HUANG Kun & FU Yali & LI Hongguang & WANG Chi & ZHONG Xiaotian & LU Qinghua & HU Chengxiao, 2017. "Effect of Combined Application of Organic Fertilizer and Chemical Fertilizer in Different Ratios on Growth, Yield and Quality of Flue-cured Tobacco," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 9(12), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:271229
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.271229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/271229/files/Effect%20of%20Combined%20Application%20of%20Organic%20Fertilizer%20and%20Chemical%20Fertilizer%20in%20Different%20Ratios%20on%20Growth%2C%20Yield%20and%20Quality%20of%20Flue-cured%20Tobacco%20.PDF
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.271229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:271229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.