IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/271226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on Water Quality Monitoring in the Urban Watercourse of Xinli River in Binzhou City

Author

Listed:
  • LI Yong

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the pH, COD, ammonia nitrogen, total nitrogen, total phosphorus and other indices regarding Xinli River water in Binzhou City. The results show that the pH of the water quality index is between 7.3 and 7.8, slightly alkaline; the COD content of Xinli River is about 140-163 mg/L, and the COD pollution is serious in some water sections; the ammonia nitrogen content of Xinli River is 0.2-2.17 mg/L, the total nitrogen content is about 0.799-1.3 mg/L, the total phosphorus content is about 0.54-0.92 mg/L, suggesting that the water eutrophication is very serious. Due to the large amount of domestic sewage discharged into Xinli River without treatment, slow circulation of river water and other factors, the eutrophication is serious in the urban watercourse.

Suggested Citation

  • LI Yong, 2017. "A Study on Water Quality Monitoring in the Urban Watercourse of Xinli River in Binzhou City," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 9(12), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:271226
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.271226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/271226/files/A%20Study%20on%20Water%20Quality%20Monitoring%20in%20the%20Urban%20Watercourse%20of%20Xinli%20River%20in%20Binzhou%20City.PDF
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.271226?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:271226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.