IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/267667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feeding Effect of Growing-Finishing Pigs under Fine Division of Feeding Stages

Author

Listed:
  • DUAN Dongliang
  • MU Xiumei
  • WANG Shuhua
  • DAN Jianghua
  • CHENG Xiaoliang
  • JIAO Fulin
  • WANG Jinbao
  • REN Hongzheng

Abstract

In order to study the feeding effect of fine division of feeding stages on the growing-finishing pigs, 96 healthy Duroc × Landrace × Yorkshire hybrid commercial pigs with similar age in days, size, and body weight about 15 kg, half boars and half sows, randomly divided into 3 treatments (each treatment repeated 4 times, and each repetition 8 pigs). According to the body weight division standard, three stages, four stages, and five stages of feeding were adopted separately. The daily ration of with different nutrition levels was used, body weight and feed consumption were measured, and effects of different feeding methods on body weight increase, feed utilization, and economic benefits of growing-finishing pigs. The results showed that compared with the three-stage feeding, the body weight of five-stage and four-stage feeding increased by 4.18% (P < 0.01) and 2.41% (P < 0.05), respectively, and the body weight of five-stage feeding increased by 1.74% (P < 0.05) compared with that of four-stage feeding; the daily feed consumption of five-stage and four-stage feeding increased 3.10% (P < 0.01) and 1.70% (P < 0.01), respectively, and the daily feed consumption of five-stage feeding was 1.37% higher than that of four-stage feeding. The feed cost of five-stage feeding and four-stage feeding increased 3.32% (P < 0.01) and 1.61% (P < 0.05) separately, and the feed cost of five-stage feeding was 1.69% higher than that of four-stage feeding (P < 0.01). The income from average body weight increase of five-stage and four-stage feeding increased by 5.47% (P < 0.01) and 3.59% (P < 0.01) respectively, and the benefit of average body weight increase of five-stage feeding was 1.81% higher than that of four-stage feeding (P > 0.05). The crude protein consumption from average body weight increase of five-stage and four-stage feeding decreased by 2.28% (P < 0.01) and 1.68% (P < 0.01), respectively; the crude protein consumption from average body weight increase of five-stage feeding was 0.67% lower than that of four-stage feeding; the feed conversion ratio of five-stage feeding, four-stage feeding, and three-stage feeding was 2.92, 2.93, and 2.95 respectively. The results showed that compared with the three-stage feeding, the four-stage and five-stage feeding could significantly increase the body weight of the growing-finishing pigs, improve the feed utilization level and improve the economic benefits, and the effect of five-stage feeding was better than the four-stage feeding.

Suggested Citation

  • DUAN Dongliang & MU Xiumei & WANG Shuhua & DAN Jianghua & CHENG Xiaoliang & JIAO Fulin & WANG Jinbao & REN Hongzheng, 2017. "Feeding Effect of Growing-Finishing Pigs under Fine Division of Feeding Stages," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 9(09), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:267667
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.267667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/267667/files/Feeding%20Effect%20of%20Growing-Finishing%20Pigs%20under%20Fine%20Division%20of%20Feeding%20Stages.PDF
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.267667?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:267667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.