IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/262813.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Main Evaluation Indicators for the Quality of Fruit Radish

Author

Listed:
  • YUAN Weiling
  • CUI Lei
  • GAN Caixia
  • DENG Xiaohui
  • QIU Zhengming

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish an scientific evaluation system for fruit radish quality. 8 quality indicators were measured for 23 varieties, such as Meinong, Qiaotouqing and Chunbulao. The indicators included root weight, root shape index, water content, crispness, soluble solids, crude fiber, isothiocyanate and vitamin C. These data were analyzed by variation correlation analysis, principal component analysis and system cluster analysis. 23 varieties of fruit radish were analyzed by variation correlation; 8 indicators were compressed into 6 integrated variables using principal component analysis. Finally, the main evaluation indicators of fruit radish were determined by using cluster analysis and correlation analysis. The results indicated that the range of variation coefficient was from 1.64%—89.99%. Water content, crispness, soluble solids, crude fiber, isothiocyanate were important components of fruit radish quality, playing a major role in the quality. These 8 indicators were closely related and relatively independent. Water content was significantly and positively correlated with crispness; soluble solids and crude fiber were significantly and negatively related to vitamin C; crispness was significantly and positively correlated with crude fiber and vitamin C. Based on the above results, 4 representative indicators were used for evaluating fruit radish quality, that is water content, crispness, soluble solids, crude fiber, which could reflect the most information of fruit radish quality.

Suggested Citation

  • YUAN Weiling & CUI Lei & GAN Caixia & DENG Xiaohui & QIU Zhengming, 2017. "The Main Evaluation Indicators for the Quality of Fruit Radish," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 9(05), May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:262813
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.262813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262813/files/The%20Main%20Evaluation%20Indicators%20for%20the%20Quality%20of%20Fruit%20Radish.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.262813?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:262813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.