IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/242490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study of Students' Achievement Evaluation Modes Based on Practical Courses concerning Higher Vocational Gardening Technology Major

Author

Listed:
  • MA, Jimin

Abstract

True, objective and impartial course and achievement evaluation is the requirement of modern higher vocational education, and can avoid "high scores and low abilities" of students to the maximum. This article focuses on expounding the "two connections and five combinations" dual evaluation modes of higher vocational gardening technology major students' achievement on practical courses, namely connection between major and industry; connection between achievement and occupation; combination of on-campus and off-campus teachers' evaluation; combination of process and results evaluation; combination of course evaluation and professional skill appraisal; combination of students' self-evaluation and teachers' evaluation; combination of examination paper and non-examination paper evaluation; combination of group and individual evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • MA, Jimin, 2016. "A Study of Students' Achievement Evaluation Modes Based on Practical Courses concerning Higher Vocational Gardening Technology Major," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 8(03), pages 1-4, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:242490
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.242490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/242490/files/20.PDF
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.242490?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:242490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.