IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/241314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Influence Factors of Pig Farmers’ Ecological Farming Behavior:Based on the TPB and SEM

Author

Listed:
  • HAN, Chengying
  • QI, Zhenhong
  • ZHANG, Dongmin
  • LI, Xinrui

Abstract

China’s extensive development model of pig industry gives rise to serious resource and environment bottleneck restriction, it is urgent to transform the existing development model into ecological farming model. In this process, farmers’ behavior will play a key role. On the basis of summarizing development connotation and characteristics of ecological agriculture, using survey data of 323 pig farmers in 6 provinces, based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) it introduced individual characteristics and external environment constraint variables, and made an empirical analysis on factors influencing intention and behavior of pig farmers’ ecological farming using the Structural Equation Model (SEM). Results indicate: (i) ecological farming intention of pig farmers has the largest direct effect on their ecological farming behavior; (ii) ecological farming cognition of pig farmers has significant positive effect on their ecological farming behavior; (iii) external environment has the largest indirect effect on their ecological farming behavior, followed by the overall effect, and external environment has significant positive effect on ecological farming attitude and cognition of pig farmers; (iv) individual characteristics (educational level and income level) of pig farmers influence ecological farming behavior of pig farmers through their ecological farming attitude and intention, but the degree of influence is limited.

Suggested Citation

  • HAN, Chengying & QI, Zhenhong & ZHANG, Dongmin & LI, Xinrui, 2016. "Research on Influence Factors of Pig Farmers’ Ecological Farming Behavior:Based on the TPB and SEM," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 8(02), pages 1-9, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:241314
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.241314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/241314/files/5.PDF
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.241314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diejun Huang & Qiuzhuo Ma & Liangyu Feng & Xiaowei Wen & Hua Li, 2018. "Applying Data Mining to China’s Swine Farming Industry: A Compromise Perspective of Economic, Environmental and Overall Performances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Xie, Jinhua & Yang, Gangqiao & Wang, Ge & Song, Yan & Yang, Fan, 2021. "How do different rural-land-consolidation modes shape farmers’ ecological production behaviors?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:241314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.