IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/208992.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation on the Efficiency and Fairness of Coordinating Public Goods Supply in Urban and Rural Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Yu, Shan
  • Ding, Zhongming

Abstract

By setting the urban-rural public goods supply model, this paper evaluates the effects of coordinating supply public goods on resource allocation and welfare from efficiency and fairness, and examines the necessity and possibility of coordinating public goods supply in urban and rural areas. The model assumes that the population size of urban and rural areas is different, and the population can not flow freely between urban and rural areas; there are different degrees of spillover in the public goods supply. Model results show that coordinating public goods supply in urban and rural areas is the result of optimizing resource allocation efficiency, but the residents' individual utility level will not necessarily improve, so residents' willingness to support coordinated urban-rural supply is different, and public goods spillover and different tax systems are the factors that affect the residents' utility level. Finally, this paper uses the practice of coordinating urban and rural compulsory education in Chengdu City to confirm the above conclusions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu, Shan & Ding, Zhongming, 2015. "Evaluation on the Efficiency and Fairness of Coordinating Public Goods Supply in Urban and Rural Areas," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 7(04), pages 1-6, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:208992
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.208992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/208992/files/2.PDF
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.208992?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:208992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.