IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/207043.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Secondary Separation of China’s Rural Land Rights from the Perspective of Analytical Jurisprudence

Author

Listed:
  • SU, Jicheng
  • LI, Hongjuan

Abstract

China’s rural land rights are incomplete in structure of land rights and functions due to status restriction. Settling dispute and problem of status in rural land right and function structure is of great significance for determining and guaranteeing subjects of rural land rights. The point connecting and solving rural land circulation issue is demonstration and settlement of status. Separating the status right from rural land property right, namely the secondary separation of right, is to realize such purpose. Currently, China’s rural land right is a bundle of rights, not the right described in property pedigree in strict sense. Using theory of rights of Hohfeld, this paper discussed and analyzed legal relationship of secondary separation of China’s rural land rights, in the hope of realizing real return from practice to theory and to practice again.

Suggested Citation

  • SU, Jicheng & LI, Hongjuan, 2015. "Analysis of Secondary Separation of China’s Rural Land Rights from the Perspective of Analytical Jurisprudence," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 7(05), pages 1-4, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:207043
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.207043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/207043/files/14.PDF
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.207043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:207043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.