IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/200502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marx's Ground Rent Theory and Innovation of China’s Urban Land System

Author

Listed:
  • ZHU, Jiefang

Abstract

China’s traditional urban land system is established in highly centralized planned economy. This system negates functions of value law and economic law fundamentally, so it is not favorable for establishment of market mechanism and development of market economy. This study took Marx’s ground rent theory as guidance, combined existing problems of China’s land use system, and made analysis on innovation of China’s urban land system from property right system, land market and land price.

Suggested Citation

  • ZHU, Jiefang, 2015. "Marx's Ground Rent Theory and Innovation of China’s Urban Land System," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 7(01), pages 1-4, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:200502
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.200502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/200502/files/17.PDF
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.200502?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:200502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.