IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/200497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis and Evaluation of IKONOS Image Fusion Algorithm Based on Land Cover Classification

Author

Listed:
  • JING, Xia
  • BAO, Yan

Abstract

Different fusion algorithm has its own advantages and limitations, so it is very difficult to simply evaluate the good points and bad points of the fusion algorithm. Whether an algorithm was selected to fuse object images was also depended upon the sensor types and special research purposes. Firstly, five fusion methods, i. e. IHS, Brovey, PCA, SFIM and Gram-Schmidt, were briefly described in the paper. And then visual judgment and quantitative statistical parameters were used to assess the five algorithms. Finally, in order to determine which one is the best suitable fusion method for land cover classification of IKONOS image, the maximum likelihood classification (MLC) was applied using the above five fusion images. The results showed that the fusion effect of SFIM transform and Gram-Schmidt transform were better than the other three image fusion methods in spatial details improvement and spectral information fidelity, and Gram-Schmidt technique was superior to SFIM transform in the aspect of expressing image details. The classification accuracy of the fused image using Gram-Schmidt and SFIM algorithms was higher than that of the other three image fusion methods, and the overall accuracy was greater than 98%. The IHS-fused image classification accuracy was the lowest, the overall accuracy and kappa coefficient were 83.14% and 0.76, respectively. Thus the IKONOS fusion images obtained by the Gram-Schmidt and SFIM were better for improving the land cover classification accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • JING, Xia & BAO, Yan, 2015. "Analysis and Evaluation of IKONOS Image Fusion Algorithm Based on Land Cover Classification," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 7(01), pages 1-6, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:200497
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.200497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/200497/files/12.PDF
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.200497?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:200497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.