IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/183272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Case Study on the Forestry Cooperation Model from Game Structure Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Hao
  • Cai, Zhijian
  • Xie, Yu

Abstract

Take Chinese yew cooperative organization for example，different game structures of forestry cooperation model were analyzed，the elative merit and applicable occasion was discussed combined with empirical investigation，and some suggestions were given also．The results showed that depending entirely on normal forest farmers cooperate spontaneously is difficult. Policies should be designed from the perspective of promoted village cadres and influential family salons to cooperation. When market factors become the main obstacle, it is necessary to introduce companies, relax constraints of forest management and build the right market atmosphere. According to unequal status of company and forest farmers，develop the cooperation model of “company + cooperation organization + farmers”. In certain circumstances，especially there are several companies vicious competition，the intervention of association can play a coordinating role．

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Hao & Cai, Zhijian & Xie, Yu, 2014. "Case Study on the Forestry Cooperation Model from Game Structure Perspective," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 6(07), pages 1-4, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:183272
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.183272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/183272/files/12.PDF
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.183272?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:183272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.