IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/180442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis on Causes of Rural Land Expropriation Disputes Based on Smith’s Model

Author

Listed:
  • XIE, Yan
  • HE, Lan

Abstract

Frequent occurrence of land expropriation disputes in rural areas of China has attracted attention of scholars to study causes. Most existing studies discuss causes from “structure-institution” level. In other words, land expropriation disputes are caused by existing imperfect institutions, regulations, and policies. Such analysis model points institutional causes, but pays little attention to policy implementation process, especially the subjective initiative of parties concerned. This paper described a decade-long land expropriation dispute case in detail. Through description of event and process and survey of reasons of actors, it revealed factors resulting in occurrence and upgrade of dispute, and analyzed factors and their interactions with the aid of Smith Process Model.

Suggested Citation

  • XIE, Yan & HE, Lan, 2014. "Analysis on Causes of Rural Land Expropriation Disputes Based on Smith’s Model," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 6(06), pages 1-4, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:180442
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.180442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/180442/files/21.PDF
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.180442?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:180442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.