IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/160732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis of Forest Conservation and Sustainable Forest Management in China and Germany

Author

Listed:
  • ZHANG, Ying
  • QIN, Qingfeng
  • FAN, Jieyu
  • CHEN, Ke

Abstract

Forestry development in Germany and China does not seem to be comparable due to differences in nature, politics, economy, society, culture and demographic situation, but the comparative study on these still has great important theoretical and practical significance. Taking into account the significant differences between the two countries, a comparative analysis was carried out through following aspects from (1) forestry policies, strategies and programs, (2) legal regulatory, administrative and socio-economic framework conditions, (3) tools and provisions and other aspects of bilateral forest protection and sustainable forest management. Researches on forest protection and sustainable forest management framework were carried out by combination of forestry development and historical review discussion in order to learn from the German experiences to promote the development of China's forestry.

Suggested Citation

  • ZHANG, Ying & QIN, Qingfeng & FAN, Jieyu & CHEN, Ke, 2013. "Comparative Analysis of Forest Conservation and Sustainable Forest Management in China and Germany," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 5(10), pages 1-4, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:160732
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.160732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/160732/files/26.PDF
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.160732?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:160732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.