IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/155874.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis and Discussion about Quantitative Grading Standard for Salary Promotion of Agricultural Scientific Researchers

Author

Listed:
  • ZOU, Xingquan
  • ZHANG, Jia
  • YAN, Chengxing
  • QING, Mingjing

Abstract

The existing performance salary system has several grades in the same job title. When the number of workers qualified for promotion is more than the target, quantitative grading is usually adopted to determine salary promotion personnel. Scientific, fair and reasonable grading content and standard directly concern income and remuneration of scientific researchers, and also concern recognition and respect degree of contribution made by scientific researchers. Therefore, quantitative grading standard is of the utmost importance to keeping stability, arousing enthusiasm and creativity of scientific researchers, and promoting smooth development of scientific research. Achievements awarded, papers published and project research can reflect scientific research level, ability and working performance of agricultural scientific researchers. This paper takes these three items as examples, analyzes, discusses and compares the establishment and evaluation of quantitative grading standard. It states that “one yardstick” and “one vote veto system” should be adhered to when evaluating using the quantitative grading standard. It is expected to provide reference for organizations of the same trade in establishing quantitative grading standard and conducting evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • ZOU, Xingquan & ZHANG, Jia & YAN, Chengxing & QING, Mingjing, 2013. "Analysis and Discussion about Quantitative Grading Standard for Salary Promotion of Agricultural Scientific Researchers," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 5(07), pages 1-3, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:155874
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.155874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/155874/files/29.PDF
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.155874?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:155874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.