IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/155842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of the Soil Water Holding Capacity and Permeability under Different Patterns of Land Use in the Eastern Qilian Mountains

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Jinmei
  • Zhang, Degang
  • Liu, Changzhong

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of the soil water holding capacity and permeability under different land use patterns in the Tianzhu alpine region of the Eastern Qilian Mountains, four land use patterns are selected, namely, natural grassland, rehabilitated land, Oats land and perennial grassland. As time lasts, different land use patterns imposed significant effects on the water holding capacity power and permeability. The soil bulk density is rehabilitated land(1.104 g/cm3) > perennial grassland(1.061 g/cm3 ) > Oats land(1.011 g/cm3) > natural grassland(0.781 g/cm3); the soil overall porosity is natural grassland(68.196%) > Oats land(60.606%) > perennial grassland(58.93%) > rehabilitated land(57.5%); the natural grassland has the most water holding capacity power and soil steady infiltration rate(681.966 t/hm2 and 3.02 mm/min), while the rehabilitated land has the least(575.005 t/hm2 and 1.004 mm/min). In terms of soil water-holding capacity and permeability, the natural grassland is the best out of these four use patterns while the rehabilitated land is the worst pattern. In other words, both oats land and perennial grassland have better water holding capacity power and permeability than the rehabilitated land.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Jinmei & Zhang, Degang & Liu, Changzhong, 2013. "The Effect of the Soil Water Holding Capacity and Permeability under Different Patterns of Land Use in the Eastern Qilian Mountains," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 5(07), pages 1-5.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:155842
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.155842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/155842/files/17.PDF
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.155842?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:155842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.