IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/133109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis on Factors Influencing Sustainable Development of Self-study Examination of Agricultural Science Disciplines

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Yan-bing

Abstract

Based on existing problems in the course of development of self-study examination of agricultural science disciplines, this paper analyzes logical conditions for its sustainable development. Major logical conditions include requirement for free and comprehensive development of individuals; requirement for social institutional evolution and change; requirement for fairness and justice of education and development; as well as requirement for better-established organization system and higher social reputation. Finally, it presents basic measures for sustainable development of self-study examination of agricultural science disciplines, including carrying on reasonable core elements of self-study examination system, adjusting structure of discipline, improving social assistance system, and expanding service space.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Yan-bing, 2012. "Analysis on Factors Influencing Sustainable Development of Self-study Examination of Agricultural Science Disciplines," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 4(01), pages 1-4, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:133109
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.133109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/133109/files/17.PDF
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.133109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:133109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.