IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/asagre/119696.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Research on the Reform and Exploration of Balancing Urban-Rural Development

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Xiao-yu

Abstract

Balancing urban and rural comprehensive reform is the major reform and developmental strategy of China. On the basis of the concept and theory of balancing rural and urban reform, the two national pilot cities Chengdu, Chongqing and several provincial pilot cities including Ningbo, Yangzhou, Shaoxing and Zigong are compared. The experiences and connotation of balancing urban and rural areas are concluded from the following four aspects. Firstly, scientific plan is a prerequisite; secondly, promoting three collections' is the core; thirdly, developing people's livelihood is the basis; fourthly, organization security is the key.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Xiao-yu, 2011. "Comparative Research on the Reform and Exploration of Balancing Urban-Rural Development," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 3(07), pages 1-4, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:119696
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.119696
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/119696/files/YangCompRes.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.119696?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:asagre:119696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.