IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/401369.html

Regional differentiation of branding of territorial communities: empirical evaluation and cluster identification

Author

Listed:
  • Tarasovych, Liudmyla
  • Pyvovar, Petro
  • Usiuk, Tetiana
  • Pyvovar, Alla
  • Budnik, Olga

Abstract

Purpose. The aim of the study is to identify and evaluate regional differentiation in the branding of territorial communities through an assessment of the four analytical pillars of territorial brand maturity, and the classification of communities according to homogeneous brand characteristics, in order to provide an analytical basis for differentiated marketing strategies of territorial development at the regional level. Methodology. The methodological basis of the study is an integrated approach to assessing the maturity of territorial community brands, covering four interrelated dimensions: brand identity and communications, territorial assets, perception and reputation, brand management and stakeholder engagement. The empirical research is based on a combination of digital asset monitoring, geoinformation analysis, expert visual audit, content analysis of strategic and regulatory documents, media monitoring and user content analysis. The quantitative assessment was carried out by normalising indicators, calculating weighted composite indices and applying cluster analysis to identify typological groups of territorial communities. Results. The results of the study showed significant regional differentiation in the level and structure of brand maturity among local communities. Significant asymmetries were identified across all four brand dimensions, with communities with low institutional and managerial capacity in the field of territorial branding dominating. Based on the results of cluster analysis, groups of communities were identified – leaders, transitional types, and territories with fragmented or undeveloped branding practices. It has been proven that a strong brand narrative and positive digital reputation can partially compensate for limited material resources, while the lack of institutionalised brand management significantly hinders its development even in financially capable communities. Originality. The novelty lies in the development and empirical testing of a multidimensional quantitative methodology for assessing the institutional maturity of territorial communities’ brands. The proposed cluster approach to typologising communities by brand maturity expands existing research on territorial branding. It enables systematic comparative analysis and the identification of stable patterns of regional differentiation, moving beyond descriptive assessments. Practical implications. The practical significance of the results lies in the possibility of their use by local self-government bodies and regional institutions as an analytical tool for diagnosing the state of the territorial brand, identifying structural constraints, and developing evidence-based, differentiated branding strategies that take into account the resource potential and institutional capacity of territorial communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Tarasovych, Liudmyla & Pyvovar, Petro & Usiuk, Tetiana & Pyvovar, Alla & Budnik, Olga, 2026. "Regional differentiation of branding of territorial communities: empirical evaluation and cluster identification," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 12(1), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:401369
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.401369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/401369/files/7_Tarasovych_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.401369?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:401369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.