IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/387567.html

Interaction between credit and entrepreneurial orientation to strengthen farmers’ intentions to diversify their income

Author

Listed:
  • Trinh, Khoa Anh

Abstract

Purpose. This study aims to assess how entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and credit access – particularly informal credit – jointly influence farmers’ decisions and intentions regarding income diversification. It identifies the determinants of credit choice and evaluates the interaction between EO and credit utilisation in shaping diversification strategies among rural households. Methodology / approach. Survey data from 367 borrowing farmers in Vietnam’s Mekong Delta were analysed using Probit and Multinomial Logit (Mlogit) models. Probit models identify factors influencing credit choices, while Mlogit models assess EO and credit source effects on past and future diversification. The study introduces an EO scale incorporating passivity, conservatism, and imitation. Results. The results reveal that entrepreneurial orientation significantly increases farmers’ likelihood of income diversification, especially when combined with commercial bank credit. This interaction suggests that entrepreneurial households better leverage formal credit for new income activities. In contrast, subsidised credit supports production but not diversification, while informal credit – despite its higher costs – remains vital for small-scale investment. Overall, the findings highlight that diversification depends not only on credit access but also on how EO enables households to use credit for entrepreneurial transformation. Originality / scientific novelty. This study contributes new behavioural evidence on how EO interacts with different credit types to shape farmers’ diversification behaviour. It advances existing literature by integrating EO into credit – diversification models and by developing an expanded EO scale that includes passivity, conservatism, and imitation – traits that are often overlooked in rural entrepreneurship research. By combining behavioural finance and rural credit analysis, the study provides a more comprehensive understanding of how entrepreneurial capacity and credit structures jointly influence livelihood diversification in emerging economies. Practical value / implications. Policymakers should integrate financial literacy training, simplify loan applications, and expand digital financial services. Strengthening bank-microfinance partnerships and local credit cooperatives can improve credit access and encourage diversification. Enhancing EO and credit access can support sustainable livelihoods, poverty reduction, and rural resilience. Further qualitative research should explore borrowing decisions and long-term EO effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Trinh, Khoa Anh, 2025. "Interaction between credit and entrepreneurial orientation to strengthen farmers’ intentions to diversify their income," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 11(4), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:387567
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.387567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/387567/files/3_Trinh_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.387567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cai, Dongliang & Song, Quanyun & Ma, Shuang & Dong, Yang & Xu, Qiuhua, 2018. "The relationship between credit constraints and household entrepreneurship in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 246-258.
    2. Carlos Luis Barzola Iza & Domenico Dentoni, 2020. "How entrepreneurial orientation drives farmers' innovation differential in Ugandan coffee multi-stakeholder platforms," Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(5), pages 629-650, June.
    3. Francisco Buera, 2009. "A dynamic model of entrepreneurship with borrowing constraints: theory and evidence," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 5(3), pages 443-464, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chun Jiang & Amei Feng & Chunhuan Xiao, 2021. "Does Capital Account Liberalization Spur Entrepreneurship: The Role of Financial Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Adolwa, Ivan S. & Zingore, Shamie & Mutegi, James & McNee, Matthew & Akorede, Bolaji A. & Masidza, Denver & Murrell, T. Scott & Ndungu, Samuel Mathu & Nchanji, Eileen & Cook, Simon & Oberthür, Thomas, 2025. "Delivering nutrient management impact through farmer-centric research: a systematic review of innovation systems in African smallholder systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Anmol Bhandari & Ellen R. McGrattan, 2017. "Sweat Equity in U.S. Private Business," Staff Report 560, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
    4. Shirai, Daichi, 2016. "Persistence and Amplification of Financial Frictions," MPRA Paper 72187, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Markus Brueckner & Tomoo Kikuchi & George Vachadze, 2016. "Effects of Income Growth on Domestic Saving Rates: The Role of Poverty and Borrowing Constraints," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2016-636, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.
    6. Amitrajeet Batabyal, 2010. "An analysis of adverse selection, entrepreneurial activity, and the decision to go public," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 79-90, July.
    7. Gergely Horváth & Rui Zhang, 2022. "Ethnic entrepreneurship, assimilation, and integration policy," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 24(4), pages 781-816, August.
    8. Weerachart T. Kilenthong & Kittipong Rueanthip, 2018. "Entrepreneurship and family businesses in Thailand," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 32(1), pages 77-93, May.
    9. Miao, Shuchao & Chi, Jing & Liao, Jing & Qian, Long, 2021. "How does religious belief promote farmer entrepreneurship in rural China?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 95-104.
    10. Castells-Quintana, David & del Pilar Lopez-Uribe, Maria & McDermott, Thomas K.J., 2018. "A review of adaptation to climate change through a development economics lens," Working Papers 309605, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit.
    11. Krueger, D. & Mitman, K. & Perri, F., 2016. "Macroeconomics and Household Heterogeneity," Handbook of Macroeconomics, in: J. B. Taylor & Harald Uhlig (ed.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 843-921, Elsevier.
    12. Yingying Zhang Zhang & Zanele Penelope Phiri, 2025. "Sustainable Entrepreneurial Mindsets and Process: A Case Study of Smallholder Farms in Eswatini," Working Papers EMS_2025_02, Research Institute, International University of Japan.
    13. Halvarsson, Daniel & Korpi, Martin & Wennberg, Karl, 2018. "Entrepreneurship and income inequality," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 275-293.
    14. Ablam Estel Apeti & Jean-Louis Combes & Eyah Denise Edoh, 2023. "Entrepreneurship in developing countries: can mobile money play a role?," Working Papers hal-04081304, HAL.
    15. Karaivanov, Alexander & Yindok, Tenzin, 2022. "Involuntary entrepreneurship – Evidence from Thai urban data," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    16. Shengxing Zhang & Nobuhiro Kiyotaki, 2017. "Intangibles, Inequality and Stagnation," 2017 Meeting Papers 1414, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    17. Dong, Zhaoyingzi & Chi-man Hui, Eddie & Yu, Chenwei, 2024. "Does housing purchase affect entrepreneurship? -Evidence from urban households in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    18. Rafael P. Ribas, 2014. "Liquidity Constraints, Informal Financing, and Entrepreneurship: Direct and Indirect Effects of a Cash Transfer Programme," Working Papers 131, International Policy Centre.
    19. D’Onofrio, Alexandra & Minetti, Raoul & Murro, Pierluigi, 2019. "Banking development, socioeconomic structure and income inequality," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 428-451.
    20. Anmol Bhandari & Serdar Birinci & Ellen R. McGrattan & Kurt See, 2020. "What Do Survey Data Tell Us about US Businesses?," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 2(4), pages 443-458, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:387567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.