IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/387554.html

The role of social networks in promoting technology adoption in rice production: evidence from panel data

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Thai, Phan
  • Nguyen Cong, Dinh
  • Le Thanh, An
  • Nguyen Duc, Kien
  • Nguyen Tran Thuy, An

Abstract

Purpose. This research aims to determine the impact of social networks, including the number of household groups involved, on the adoption of technologies such as improved rice varieties, chemical fertilisers, and organic fertilisers in the rice production sector in Vietnam. Methodology / approach. This study used panel data from the Vietnam Access to Resources Household Survey (VARHS) from 2012 to 2018. After merging several files of data, the study received the panel data with 684 households for each period. This study involves establishing an internal instrumental variable to mitigate the problem of the endogeneity of social networks and measure its impact on technology adoption. In addition, several estimations, such as Instrumental Variables (IV), Fixed Effects (FE), Correlated Random Effects (CRE), and Random Effects (RE), were used to show the relationship between social networks and technology adoption in rice production. Results. The study’s results suggest that using social networks tends to increase the likelihood of using organic fertiliser in rice production. Across all model specifications, including Random Effects, Correlated Random Effects, and Fixed Effects, household participation in social groups has a statistically significant positive effect on organic fertiliser adoption. However, the difference in those models about the coefficients suggests that these standard panel estimators may underestimate the true impact of social networks. This potential downward bias highlights the importance of addressing endogeneity, reinforcing the need for Instrumental Variable (IV) approaches in such analyses. On the other hand, the research does not discover any connection between social networks and the adoption of technologies like chemical fertilisers and improved seeds. Originality / scientific novelty. This is the first study that rigorously investigates the relationship between social networks and technology adoption in rice production in Vietnam, using long panel data and an internal instrumental variable approach. While prior research in other developing countries (e.g., China, Ethiopia) has explored similar themes, our study contributes by providing country-specific evidence from Vietnam’s rice sector, a globally significant producer. Practical value / implications. In light of the findings, policymakers can leverage the positive influence of social relations to encourage more environmentally responsible farming methods in the production of rice. By prioritising the promotion of social networks, policymakers can encourage the use of organic fertilisers.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Thai, Phan & Nguyen Cong, Dinh & Le Thanh, An & Nguyen Duc, Kien & Nguyen Tran Thuy, An, 2025. "The role of social networks in promoting technology adoption in rice production: evidence from panel data," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 11(3), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:387554
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.387554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/387554/files/12_Nguyen%20Thai_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.387554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Awudu Abdulai, 2023. "Information acquisition and the adoption of improved crop varieties," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(4), pages 1049-1062, August.
    2. Ariel BenYishay & A Mushfiq Mobarak, 2019. "Social Learning and Incentives for Experimentation and Communication," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 86(3), pages 976-1009.
    3. Mesele Belay & Markew Mengiste, 2023. "The ex‐post impact of agricultural technology adoption on poverty: Evidence from north Shewa zone of Amhara region, Ethiopia," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 1327-1337, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leavens, Laura & Bauchet, Jonathan & Ricker-Gilbert, Jacob, 2021. "After the project is over: Measuring longer-term impacts of a food safety intervention in Senegal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    2. Hossain, Marup & Songsermsawas, Tisorn, 2025. "Adapting to Thrive: Training and Access to Finance to Reduce Climate Vulnerability Among Smallholder Farmers in Nepal," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 361170, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Fafchamps, Marcel & Islam, Asad & Malek, Mohammad Abdul & Pakrashi, Debayan, 2020. "Can referral improve targeting? Evidence from an agricultural training experiment," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Mingyue Li & Pujie Zhao & Yu Sun, 2025. "Impacts of Green Perception Benefits and Environmental Regulation Intensity on Farmers’ Agricultural Green Production Willingness: A New Perspective of Technology Acquisition," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-33, June.
    5. Alison Andrew & Orazio Attanasio & Britta Augsburg & Jere Behrman & Monimalika Day & Pamela Jervis & Costas Meghir & Angus Phimister, 2024. "Mothers’ Social Networks and Socioeconomic Gradients of Isolation," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 73(1), pages 487-522.
    6. Beg, Sabrin & Islam, Mahnaz & Rahman, Khandker Wahedur, 2024. "Information and behavior: Evidence from fertilizer quantity recommendations in Bangladesh," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    7. Afridi, Farzana & Dhillon, Amrita & Roy, Sanchari & Sangwan, Nikita, 2023. "Social Networks, Gender Norms and Labor Supply: Experimental Evidence Using a Job Search Platform," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 677, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    8. Belard, Amandine & Farolfi, Stefano & Jourdain, Damien & Manyanga, Mark & Pedzisa, Tarisayi & Willinger, Marc, 2025. "They know each other, but do they trust each other? Social capital and selected beneficiaries of community-based development projects: A lab-in-the-field in rural Zimbabwe," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    9. Ning Geng & Shanyao Wang & Xibing Han, 2025. "Efficacy of Social Networks in Promoting the Green Production Behaviors of Chinese Farmers: An Empirical Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.
    10. de Janvry, Alain & Sadoulet, Elisabeth, 2020. "Using agriculture for development: Supply- and demand-side approaches," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    11. Ruth Hill & Carolina Mejia-Mantilla & Kathryn Vasilaky, 2021. "Is the Price Right? Returns to Input Adoption in Uganda," Working Papers 2105, California Polytechnic State University, Department of Economics.
    12. repec:ags:aaea22:335604 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Osiemo, Jamleck & Sibiko, Kenneth Waluse & Ng'ang'a, Stanley Karanja & Notenbaert, An M.O., 2024. "Are dairy farmers willing to pay for improved forage varieties? Experimental evidence from Kenya," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    14. Ufer, Danielle J. & Ortega, David L. & Wolf, Christopher A. & McKendree, Melissa & Swanson, Janice, 2022. "Getting past the gatekeeper: Key motivations of dairy farmer intent to adopt animal health and welfare-improving biotechnology," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    15. Dakuan Qiao & Lei Luo & Chenyang Zhou & Xinhong Fu, 2023. "The influence of social learning on Chinese farmers’ adoption of green pest control: mediation by environmental literacy and moderation by market conditions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 13305-13330, November.
    16. Thi Quynh Anh Le & Yasuharu Shimamura & Hiroyuki Yamada & Minh Duc Le, 2025. "Gender, social networks, and the use of organic fertilizers toward sustainable agriculture in suburban villages of Central Vietnam," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 1401-1416, February.
    17. Nyondo, Christone J. & Minofu, Joyce & Goeb, Joseph & Burke, William J. & Kambewa, Daemon & Chikowo, Regis & Snapp, Sieglinde, 2025. "The impact of site-specific soil-test-based extension advice on farm management in Malawi," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    18. Wu, Haixia & Ge, Yan & Li, Jianping, 2023. "Uncertainty, time preference and households’ adoption of rooftop photovoltaic technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    19. Shikuku, Kelvin Mashisia & Lepariyo, Watson Saewua & Obonyo, Meshack Baraza & Ochenje, Ibrahim, 2025. "Crowdsourcing initiatives and the diffusion of information: Experimental evidence from livestock keepers in Kenya," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    20. Michelson, Hope & Gourlay, Sydney & Lybbert, Travis & Wollburg, Philip, 2023. "Review: Purchased agricultural input quality and small farms," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    21. Lasdun, Violet & Harou, Aurélie & Magomba, Chris & Guereña, Davíd, 2025. "Peer learning and technology adoption in a digital farmer-to-farmer network," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127762, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:387554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.