IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/387554.html

The role of social networks in promoting technology adoption in rice production: evidence from panel data

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Thai, Phan
  • Nguyen Cong, Dinh
  • Le Thanh, An
  • Nguyen Duc, Kien
  • Nguyen Tran Thuy, An

Abstract

Purpose. This research aims to determine the impact of social networks, including the number of household groups involved, on the adoption of technologies such as improved rice varieties, chemical fertilisers, and organic fertilisers in the rice production sector in Vietnam. Methodology / approach. This study used panel data from the Vietnam Access to Resources Household Survey (VARHS) from 2012 to 2018. After merging several files of data, the study received the panel data with 684 households for each period. This study involves establishing an internal instrumental variable to mitigate the problem of the endogeneity of social networks and measure its impact on technology adoption. In addition, several estimations, such as Instrumental Variables (IV), Fixed Effects (FE), Correlated Random Effects (CRE), and Random Effects (RE), were used to show the relationship between social networks and technology adoption in rice production. Results. The study’s results suggest that using social networks tends to increase the likelihood of using organic fertiliser in rice production. Across all model specifications, including Random Effects, Correlated Random Effects, and Fixed Effects, household participation in social groups has a statistically significant positive effect on organic fertiliser adoption. However, the difference in those models about the coefficients suggests that these standard panel estimators may underestimate the true impact of social networks. This potential downward bias highlights the importance of addressing endogeneity, reinforcing the need for Instrumental Variable (IV) approaches in such analyses. On the other hand, the research does not discover any connection between social networks and the adoption of technologies like chemical fertilisers and improved seeds. Originality / scientific novelty. This is the first study that rigorously investigates the relationship between social networks and technology adoption in rice production in Vietnam, using long panel data and an internal instrumental variable approach. While prior research in other developing countries (e.g., China, Ethiopia) has explored similar themes, our study contributes by providing country-specific evidence from Vietnam’s rice sector, a globally significant producer. Practical value / implications. In light of the findings, policymakers can leverage the positive influence of social relations to encourage more environmentally responsible farming methods in the production of rice. By prioritising the promotion of social networks, policymakers can encourage the use of organic fertilisers.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Thai, Phan & Nguyen Cong, Dinh & Le Thanh, An & Nguyen Duc, Kien & Nguyen Tran Thuy, An, 2025. "The role of social networks in promoting technology adoption in rice production: evidence from panel data," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 11(3), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:387554
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.387554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/387554/files/12_Nguyen%20Thai_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.387554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Awudu Abdulai, 2023. "Information acquisition and the adoption of improved crop varieties," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(4), pages 1049-1062, August.
    2. Ariel BenYishay & A Mushfiq Mobarak, 2019. "Social Learning and Incentives for Experimentation and Communication," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 86(3), pages 976-1009.
    3. Mesele Belay & Markew Mengiste, 2023. "The ex‐post impact of agricultural technology adoption on poverty: Evidence from north Shewa zone of Amhara region, Ethiopia," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 1327-1337, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tuan Nguyen‐Anh & Do Pham‐Thanh & Anh Dao‐Viet & Nguyen To‐The, 2025. "Do Community‐Oriented Farmers Present a Greater Willingness for Organic Transition: Evidence From Vietnam," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 56(6), pages 1168-1191, November.
    2. Leavens, Laura & Bauchet, Jonathan & Ricker-Gilbert, Jacob, 2021. "After the project is over: Measuring longer-term impacts of a food safety intervention in Senegal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    3. Alain de Janvry & Elisabeth Sadoulet, 2019. "Transforming developing country agriculture: Removing adoption constraints and promoting inclusive value chain development," Working Papers hal-02287668, HAL.
    4. Hossain, Marup & Songsermsawas, Tisorn, 2025. "Adapting to Thrive: Training and Access to Finance to Reduce Climate Vulnerability Among Smallholder Farmers in Nepal," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 361170, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Toritseju Begho, 2022. "Is the Willingness to Take Risks a Credential for Being a Model Farmer?," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 16(3-4), pages 433-452, August.
    6. Posey, Sean & Magnan, Nicholas & McCullough, Ellen & Opoku, Nelson & Abujaja, Afi, 2022. "Exploring Intra-Household Information Sharing Using a Lab in the Field," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322225, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Fafchamps, Marcel & Islam, Asad & Malek, Mohammad Abdul & Pakrashi, Debayan, 2020. "Can referral improve targeting? Evidence from an agricultural training experiment," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    8. Julián F. Becerra-Encinales & Paloma Bernal-Hernandez & Jorge A. Beltrán-Giraldo & Alexandre P. Cooman & Luis H. Reyes & Juan C. Cruz, 2024. "Agricultural Extension for Adopting Technological Practices in Developing Countries: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Dimensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, April.
    9. Farris, Jarrad & Maredia, Mywish K. & Mason, Nicole M. & Ortega, David L., 2024. "Farmer personality and community-based extension effectiveness in Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    10. Jamleck Osiemo & Francesco Cecchi & Erwin Bulte & Caroline Mwongera, 2026. "Experiential learning, narrative‐based learning, and insurance adoption: Experimental evidence from Kenya," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 108(1), pages 232-253, January.
    11. Mingyue Li & Pujie Zhao & Yu Sun, 2025. "Impacts of Green Perception Benefits and Environmental Regulation Intensity on Farmers’ Agricultural Green Production Willingness: A New Perspective of Technology Acquisition," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-33, June.
    12. Arslan, Cansın & Wollni, Meike & Oduol, Judith & Hughes, Karl, 2022. "Who communicates the information matters for technology adoption," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    13. Alison Andrew & Orazio Attanasio & Britta Augsburg & Jere Behrman & Monimalika Day & Pamela Jervis & Costas Meghir & Angus Phimister, 2024. "Mothers’ Social Networks and Socioeconomic Gradients of Isolation," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 73(1), pages 487-522.
    14. Beg, Sabrin & Islam, Mahnaz & Rahman, Khandker Wahedur, 2024. "Information and behavior: Evidence from fertilizer quantity recommendations in Bangladesh," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    15. Afridi, Farzana & Dhillon, Amrita & Roy, Sanchari & Sangwan, Nikita, 2023. "Social Networks, Gender Norms and Labor Supply: Experimental Evidence Using a Job Search Platform," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 677, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    16. Belard, Amandine & Farolfi, Stefano & Jourdain, Damien & Manyanga, Mark & Pedzisa, Tarisayi & Willinger, Marc, 2025. "They know each other, but do they trust each other? Social capital and selected beneficiaries of community-based development projects: A lab-in-the-field in rural Zimbabwe," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    17. Ning Geng & Shanyao Wang & Xibing Han, 2025. "Efficacy of Social Networks in Promoting the Green Production Behaviors of Chinese Farmers: An Empirical Study," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.
    18. Adjognon, Guigonan Serge & Liverpool-Tasie, Saweda & Dillon, Andrew & Bloem, Jeffrey, 2021. "Transaction Costs, Input Subsidies, and Climate-Smart Agricultural Technology Adoption: Experimental Evidence from Rice Farmers in Nigeria," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315157, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Ambler, Kate & Godlonton, Susan & Recalde, María P., 2021. "Follow the leader? A field experiment on social influence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 1280-1297.
    20. Kajisa, Kei & Vu, Trang Thu, 2023. "The importance of farm management training for the African rice Green Revolution: Experimental evidence from rainfed lowland areas in Mozambique," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:387554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.