IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/387553.html

Business expectations as indicators of production constraints in agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Shkvarchuk, Lyudmyla
  • Slav’yuk, Rostyslav
  • Kucher, Lesia

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to identify latent indicators derived from business expectations of agricultural enterprises regarding production barriers (obstacles) and to assess their impact on agricultural output dynamics. Methodology / approach. The principal components analysis (PCA) method was applied to reduce dimensionality and eliminate multicollinearity among independent variables and to aggregate subjective assessments of production barriers reported by agricultural producers. Regression and correlation analysis are used to examine the direction and strength of relationships between the principal components and production volumes. The data are from the State Statistics Service of Ukraine for 2015–2024. Results. Two latent components (PC1, PC2) summarising the structure of production barriers were identified. The principal components reflect the opposite poles of farmers’ expectations: on the one hand, financial and material constraints, and on the other, the absence of constraints. This confirms that business expectations can be reduced to integrated latent dimensions that summarise the presence or absence of barriers to production. PC1 and PC2 revealed a strong positive statistically significant relationship with actual production volumes, which indicates their significance as aggregate indicators of business assessments. At the same time, the negative insignificant correlation of PC1 with production in constant prices affects the ambivalence of its interpretation, since its structure simultaneously contains the influence of both favourable and restrictive factors. Additional components (such as PC7) demonstrated a higher significant correlation with production volumes in constant prices than the leading components. This means that secondary, less dispersion-significant latent factors may be more informative for explaining the dynamics of production volume in constant prices. The business expectation system in agriculture has a multidimensional nature, where key barriers and incentives do not always coincide with the most variable factors, but may have greater predictive value for assessing future production. Originality / scientific novelty. The study presents a novel combination of PCA and regression analyse for interpreting business expectations as a latent indicator of production conditions. The scientific contribution lies in identifying latent indicators of subjective evaluations that are statistically linked to real production outcomes, even in the absence of direct objective measurements. Practical value / implications. The results can be used to develop a risk monitoring system in agriculture based on aggregated indicators. This approach improves the accuracy of assessing sectoral conditions and contributes to the development of more targeted agricultural policies, aimed both at overcoming critical barriers and enhancing adaptive capacity of producers.

Suggested Citation

  • Shkvarchuk, Lyudmyla & Slav’yuk, Rostyslav & Kucher, Lesia, 2025. "Business expectations as indicators of production constraints in agriculture," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 11(3), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:387553
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.387553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/387553/files/11_Shkvarchuk_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.387553?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R?diger Bachmann & Steffen Elstner & Eric R. Sims, 2013. "Uncertainty and Economic Activity: Evidence from Business Survey Data," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 5(2), pages 217-249, April.
    2. Aaron H. Anglin & Aaron F. McKenny & Jeremy C. Short, 2018. "The Impact of Collective Optimism on New Venture Creation and Growth: A Social Contagion Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(3), pages 390-425, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikolay Hristov & Markus Roth, 2019. "Uncertainty Shocks and Financial Crisis Indicators," CESifo Working Paper Series 7839, CESifo.
    2. Bonciani, Dario, 2015. "Estimating the effects of uncertainty over the business cycle," MPRA Paper 65921, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Idriss Fontaine, 2021. "Uncertainty and Labour Force Participation," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 83(2), pages 437-471, April.
    4. Salzmann, Leonard, 2020. "The Impact of Uncertainty and Financial Shocks in Recessions and Booms," VfS Annual Conference 2020 (Virtual Conference): Gender Economics 224588, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    5. Marfatia, Hardik A., 2015. "Monetary policy's time-varying impact on the US bond markets: Role of financial stress and risks," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 103-123.
    6. Alessandri, Piergiorgio & Mumtaz, Haroon, 2019. "Financial regimes and uncertainty shocks," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 31-46.
    7. Chen, Cheng & Senga, Tatsuro & Sun, Chang & Zhang, Hongyong, 2023. "Uncertainty, imperfect information, and expectation formation over the firm’s life cycle," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 60-77.
    8. Comunale, Mariarosaria & Nguyen, Anh Dinh Minh, 2025. "A comprehensive MacroEconomic uncertainty measure for the euro area and its implications to COVID-19," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Nakazono, Yoshiyuki & Koga, Maiko & Sugo, Tomohiro, 2020. "Private information and analyst coverage: Evidence from firm survey data," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 284-298.
    10. Yuan, Di & Li, Sufang & Li, Rong & Zhang, Feipeng, 2022. "Economic policy uncertainty, oil and stock markets in BRIC: Evidence from quantiles analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    11. Carmen Orden‐Cruz & Jessica Paule‐Vianez & Júlio Lobão, 2023. "The effect of Economic Policy Uncertainty on the credit risk of US commercial banks," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 3420-3436, July.
    12. Sterk, Vincent, 2016. "The dark corners of the labor market," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86244, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Boysen-Hogrefe, Jens & Groll, Dominik & Hoffmann, Timo & Jannsen, Nils & Kooths, Stefan & Schröder, Christian & Sonnenberg, Nils, 2024. "Deutsche Wirtschaft im Winter 2024: Kein Aufschwung in Sicht [German Forecast in Winter 2024: No Recovery in Sight]," Kieler Konjunkturberichte 120, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    14. Bandi, Federico M. & Bretscher, Lorenzo & Tamoni, Andrea, 2023. "Return predictability with endogenous growth," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(3).
    15. Aleksejs Krecetovs & Pasquale Della Corte, 2016. "Macro uncertainty and currency premia," 2016 Meeting Papers 624, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    16. Dudley Cooke & Tatiana Damjanovic, 2020. "Optimal Fiscal Policy in a Model of Firm Entry with Financial Frictions," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 35, pages 74-96, January.
    17. Okan Akarsu & Emrehan Aktug & Huzeyfe Torun, 2025. "Inflation Expectations and Firms' Decisions in High Inflation: Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial," Working Papers 2512, Research and Monetary Policy Department, Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.
    18. Herwartz, Helmut & Lange, Alexander & Maxand, Simone, 2019. "Statistical identification in SVARs - Monte Carlo experiments and a comparative assessment of the role of economic uncertainties for the US business cycle," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 375, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    19. Giovanni Angelini & Emanuele Bacchiocchi & Giovanni Caggiano & Luca Fanelli, 2019. "Uncertainty across volatility regimes," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(3), pages 437-455, April.
    20. Arigoni, Filippo & Lenarčič, Črt, 2020. "The impact of trade policy uncertainty shocks on the Euro Area," MPRA Paper 100832, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:387553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.