IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/387553.html

Business expectations as indicators of production constraints in agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Shkvarchuk, Lyudmyla
  • Slav’yuk, Rostyslav
  • Kucher, Lesia

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to identify latent indicators derived from business expectations of agricultural enterprises regarding production barriers (obstacles) and to assess their impact on agricultural output dynamics. Methodology / approach. The principal components analysis (PCA) method was applied to reduce dimensionality and eliminate multicollinearity among independent variables and to aggregate subjective assessments of production barriers reported by agricultural producers. Regression and correlation analysis are used to examine the direction and strength of relationships between the principal components and production volumes. The data are from the State Statistics Service of Ukraine for 2015–2024. Results. Two latent components (PC1, PC2) summarising the structure of production barriers were identified. The principal components reflect the opposite poles of farmers’ expectations: on the one hand, financial and material constraints, and on the other, the absence of constraints. This confirms that business expectations can be reduced to integrated latent dimensions that summarise the presence or absence of barriers to production. PC1 and PC2 revealed a strong positive statistically significant relationship with actual production volumes, which indicates their significance as aggregate indicators of business assessments. At the same time, the negative insignificant correlation of PC1 with production in constant prices affects the ambivalence of its interpretation, since its structure simultaneously contains the influence of both favourable and restrictive factors. Additional components (such as PC7) demonstrated a higher significant correlation with production volumes in constant prices than the leading components. This means that secondary, less dispersion-significant latent factors may be more informative for explaining the dynamics of production volume in constant prices. The business expectation system in agriculture has a multidimensional nature, where key barriers and incentives do not always coincide with the most variable factors, but may have greater predictive value for assessing future production. Originality / scientific novelty. The study presents a novel combination of PCA and regression analyse for interpreting business expectations as a latent indicator of production conditions. The scientific contribution lies in identifying latent indicators of subjective evaluations that are statistically linked to real production outcomes, even in the absence of direct objective measurements. Practical value / implications. The results can be used to develop a risk monitoring system in agriculture based on aggregated indicators. This approach improves the accuracy of assessing sectoral conditions and contributes to the development of more targeted agricultural policies, aimed both at overcoming critical barriers and enhancing adaptive capacity of producers.

Suggested Citation

  • Shkvarchuk, Lyudmyla & Slav’yuk, Rostyslav & Kucher, Lesia, 2025. "Business expectations as indicators of production constraints in agriculture," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 11(3), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:387553
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.387553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/387553/files/11_Shkvarchuk_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.387553?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R?diger Bachmann & Steffen Elstner & Eric R. Sims, 2013. "Uncertainty and Economic Activity: Evidence from Business Survey Data," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 5(2), pages 217-249, April.
    2. Aaron H. Anglin & Aaron F. McKenny & Jeremy C. Short, 2018. "The Impact of Collective Optimism on New Venture Creation and Growth: A Social Contagion Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(3), pages 390-425, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blanka Škrabić Perić & Petar Sorić, 2018. "A Note on the “Economic Policy Uncertainty Index”," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 505-526, June.
    2. Nikolay Hristov & Markus Roth, 2019. "Uncertainty Shocks and Financial Crisis Indicators," CESifo Working Paper Series 7839, CESifo.
    3. Oliver de Groot & Alexander W. Richter & Nathaniel A. Throckmorton, 2018. "Uncertainty Shocks in a Model of Effective Demand: Comment," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(4), pages 1513-1526, July.
    4. Bonciani, Dario, 2015. "Estimating the effects of uncertainty over the business cycle," MPRA Paper 65921, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Benchimol, Jonathan & El-Shagi, Makram & Saadon, Yossi, 2022. "Do expert experience and characteristics affect inflation forecasts?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 205-226.
    6. Ivana Lolić & Petar Sorić & Marija Logarušić, 2022. "Economic Policy Uncertainty Index Meets Ensemble Learning," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 60(2), pages 401-437, August.
    7. Idriss Fontaine, 2021. "Uncertainty and Labour Force Participation," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 83(2), pages 437-471, April.
    8. Salzmann, Leonard, 2020. "The Impact of Uncertainty and Financial Shocks in Recessions and Booms," VfS Annual Conference 2020 (Virtual Conference): Gender Economics 224588, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    9. Binge, Laurie H. & Boshoff, Willem H., 2020. "Economic uncertainty in South Africa," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 113-131.
    10. Marfatia, Hardik A., 2015. "Monetary policy's time-varying impact on the US bond markets: Role of financial stress and risks," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 103-123.
    11. Balcilar, Mehmet & Demirer, Riza & Gupta, Rangan & van Eyden, Reneé, 2017. "The impact of US policy uncertainty on the monetary effectiveness in the Euro area," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 1052-1064.
    12. Dario Bonciani & Joonseok Jason Oh, 2019. "The long-run effects of uncertainty shocks," Bank of England working papers 802, Bank of England.
    13. Alessandri, Piergiorgio & Mumtaz, Haroon, 2019. "Financial regimes and uncertainty shocks," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 31-46.
    14. Olli Palm'en, 2022. "Macroeconomic Effect of Uncertainty and Financial Shocks: a non-Gaussian VAR approach," Papers 2202.10834, arXiv.org.
    15. repec:rim:rimwps:19-03 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Stefan Sauer & Klaus Wohlrabe, 2025. "Explaining Business Sentiment: Insights from the ifo Business Survey," Journal of Business Cycle Research, Springer;Centre for International Research on Economic Tendency Surveys (CIRET), vol. 21(2), pages 213-235, December.
    17. Popp, Aaron & Zhang, Fang, 2016. "The macroeconomic effects of uncertainty shocks: The role of the financial channel," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 319-349.
    18. M. E. Bontempi & M. Frigeri & R. Golinelli & M. Squadrani, 2019. "Uncertainty, Perception and the Internet," Working Papers wp1134, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    19. Bachmann, Rüdiger & Born, Benjamin & Elstner, Steffen & Grimme, Christian, 2019. "Time-varying business volatility and the price setting of firms," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 82-99.
    20. Chen, Cheng & Senga, Tatsuro & Sun, Chang & Zhang, Hongyong, 2023. "Uncertainty, imperfect information, and expectation formation over the firm’s life cycle," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 60-77.
    21. Drobetz, Wolfgang & El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane & Janzen, Malte, 2018. "Policy uncertainty, investment, and the cost of capital," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 28-45.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:387553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.