IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/387546.html

Fiscal determinants of the green transformation of the agricultural sector: modelling the impact of tax policy in the context of the European Green Deal

Author

Listed:
  • Kraievskyi, Volodymyr
  • Skoryk, Maryna
  • Savchenko, Alla
  • Polishchuk, Serhii
  • Hryshchuk, Hanna

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the article is to determine the role of fiscal instruments in ensuring the ecological transformation of the agricultural sector of Ukraine, considering European integration guidelines and sustainable development objectives. Methodology / approach. The study uses the authors’ analytical approach to assessing the fiscal impact on the “green” transition, which is based on institutional, comparative and content analysis of regulatory legal acts, EU strategic documents, statistical data and scientific sources. Within the framework of the model, fiscal instruments are classified according to their stimulating potential and a qualitative assessment of effectiveness in the context of agricultural greening is applied. Results. The results of the study showed the limited impact of the current tax policy of Ukraine on the greening of agriculture, primarily due to the lack of targeted instruments, weak differentiation and insufficient implementation of the “polluter pays” principle. At the same time, the potential for adapting European approaches to the conditions of the Ukrainian economy has been identified, by transforming environmental taxation, expanding tax benefits and targeted subsidies for environmental measures. Originality / scientific novelty. A conceptual model of the fiscal impact on the green transition in the agricultural sector under a transitional economy is summarised, covering taxes, incentives, and fiscal transfers as tools to promote environmentalisation. An approach is proposed for qualitatively assessing the effectiveness of tax mechanisms, considering the extent of their influence on changing the environmental behaviour of agricultural producers. For the first time, the domestic tax system is examined through the lens of its alignment with the environmental goals of the European Green Deal, identifying functional gaps in national tax regulation. The article also contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary methodology for researching fiscal policy by combining institutional, economic-environmental, and strategic approaches within a single research toolkit. Practical value / implications. The obtained results can be used by government authorities and legislative bodies, in particular by the Ministry of Economy, Environment and Agriculture of Ukraine, the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine, relevant committees of the Verkhovna Rada, industry associations, and research and analytical centres for shaping fiscal policy in the agricultural sector, developing tax incentive instruments for environmentalisation, and adapting national legislation to the requirements of the European Green Deal.

Suggested Citation

  • Kraievskyi, Volodymyr & Skoryk, Maryna & Savchenko, Alla & Polishchuk, Serhii & Hryshchuk, Hanna, 2025. "Fiscal determinants of the green transformation of the agricultural sector: modelling the impact of tax policy in the context of the European Green Deal," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 11(3), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:387546
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.387546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/387546/files/4_Kraievskyi_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.387546?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Finger, Robert & Pedersen, Anders Branth, 2025. "Input taxes in agriculture: Experiences and perspectives for European agriculture," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Ana Clara Borrego & Rute Abreu & Francisco Alegria Carreira & Filipe Caetano & Ana Lúcia Vasconcelos, 2023. "Environmental Taxation on the Agri-Food Sector and the Farm to Fork Strategy: The Portuguese Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Dumortier, Jerome & Elobeid, Amani, 2021. "Effects of a carbon tax in the United States on agricultural markets and carbon emissions from land-use change," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Shenglan & Huang, Junlin & Wang, Xiuxiu & Fu, Ying, 2025. "Multi-scenario simulation of low-carbon land use based on the SD-FLUS model in Changsha, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    2. Qianyu Zhao & Boyu Xie & Mengyao Han, 2023. "Unpacking the Sub-Regional Spatial Network of Land-Use Carbon Emissions: The Case of Sichuan Province in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Yichen Ding & Yaping Huang & Lairong Xie & Shiwei Lu & Leizhou Zhu & Chunguang Hu & Yidan Chen, 2022. "Spatial Patterns Exploration and Impacts Modelling of Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Three Stages of Metropolitan Areas in the YREB, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Yumiao Zhang & Qi Yin & Yufan Wu & Kun Ma, 2026. "Impact of formal and informal environmental regulations on agricultural carbon emissions: Empirical evidence from China," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 72(1), pages 19-36.
    5. Li, Xiang & Chen, Beizi & Liu, Haijun & Xu, Mengqi & Yang, Haijun, 2025. "Characteristics of agricultural carbon emissions in arid zones, drivers and decoupling effects: evidence from Xinjiang, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    6. Fournier Gabela, Julio G. & Freund, Florian, 2022. "Potential carbon leakage risk: A cross-sector cross-country assessment in the OECD area," Conference papers 333468, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Altanshagai Batmunkh & Agus Dwi Nugroho & Maria Fekete-Farkas & Zoltan Lakner, 2022. "Global Challenges and Responses: Agriculture, Economic Globalization, and Environmental Sustainability in Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Ahmad, Salman, 2025. "Pathways to environmental sustainability in developing Asia: Insights from environmental policy, green innovation and energy structure," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    9. Lu, Xunfa & He, Pengchao & Zhang, Zhengjun & Apergis, Nicholas, 2024. "Extreme co-movements between CO2 emission allowances and commodity markets and their response to economic policy uncertainty," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    10. Obuobi, Bright & Awuah, Faustina & Nketiah, Emmanuel & Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Shi, Victor & Hu, Guoping, 2024. "The dynamics of green innovation, environmental policy and energy structure for environmental sustainability; Evidence from AfCFTA countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    11. Zhi Li & Tingting Cao & Zhongye Sun, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Pattern and Driving Factors of Carbon Emission Intensity of Main Crops in Henan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Yubo Wang & Xizhu Yang, 2022. "Fiscal Ecological Cost of Land in China: Estimation and Regional Differences," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:387546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.