IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/364293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Current challenges and complications of organic production and land use in Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Budziak, Olha
  • Budziak, Vasyl

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to assess the impact of conventional farming on organic farming, taking into account modern challenges and complications for making management decisions to ensure sustainable use and long-term conservation of land suitable for organic farming. Methodology / approach. The methodological approach involves the study of the practice of regulating the sustainable use of pesticides by analysing indicators: traditional agriculture (area and volume of pesticide application) and organic (area of organic land) and conducting correlation and regression analysis to identify cause and effect relationships and their dynamics; the basis for the calculation were indicators for the period 2018–2023. Results. It has been established that organic production and land use in accordance with the European Green Deal policy and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development require the sustainable use of pesticides. The data analysis confirmed that more than 90% of usable organic land is involved in the traditional system of cultivation with the use of a full range of pesticides, the volume of which has increased to 1.56 kg/ha on average. The study of the impact of pesticides according to the indicator system during 2018–2023 showed that while at the beginning of the study period the relationship was rather weak, it increased significantly in 2023 with the increase in pesticide use against the background of a sharp decrease in the area of organic land. It is the upward trend in pesticide application that should not be ignored in Vinnytsia, Kyiv, and especially in Ternopil, Ivano-Frankivsk, and Khmelnytsky regions, where pesticide use exceeded 1.8 kg/ha. And given the contamination caused by the war, the land may be transformed from suitable to unsuitable for organic use. The current system requires regulation of sustainable pesticide use in accordance with European standards and the introduction of a mechanism for preventive control of contamination of land potentially suitable for organic farming. Despite the current challenges and complications, Ukrainian organic operators continue to develop organic production, providing Ukraine and the world with high-quality organic products. Originality / scientific novelty. For the first time, the impact of conventional agriculture on organic agriculture was assessed by indicators in dynamics and the regions with potentially suitable organic lands were grouped by the level of pesticide contamination, and the need to regulate the sustainable use of pesticides in order to reduce losses in organic production in the face of climate change was substantiated. Practical value / implications. The results of the study can serve as a basis for the development of strategies for the development of agriculture and rural areas in the context of the regions of Ukraine in terms of regulating the sustainable use of pesticides, to improve soil conditions, product quality and environmental protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Budziak, Olha & Budziak, Vasyl, . "Current challenges and complications of organic production and land use in Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 11(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:364293
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.364293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/364293/files/1_Budziak_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.364293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hörner, Denise & Wollni, Meike, 2021. "Integrated soil fertility management and household welfare in Ethiopia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    2. Brown, Calum & Kovács, Eszter & Herzon, Irina & Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio & Albizua, Amaia & Galanaki, Antonia & Grammatikopoulou, Ioanna & McCracken, Davy & Olsson, Johanna Alkan & Zinngrebe, Yves, 2021. "Simplistic understandings of farmer motivations could undermine the environmental potential of the common agricultural policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. Skorokhod, Iryna & Skrypchuk, Petro & Shpak, Halyna & Chemerys, Vasyl & Yakubiv, Roman, . "Assessment of efficiency of the organic production development in Western Polissia regions," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(4).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paulus, Anne & Hagemann, Nina & Baaken, Marieke C. & Roilo, Stephanie & Alarcón-Segura, Viviana & Cord, Anna F. & Beckmann, Michael, 2022. "Landscape context and farm characteristics are key to farmers' adoption of agri-environmental schemes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    2. Andreea-Emanuela Drăgoi, 2022. "The Role of Common Agricultural Policy for Enhancing the Resilience of Rural Areas under the Current Global Challenges," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 10(2), pages 6-17, December.
    3. Johanna Norris & Bettina Matzdorf & Rena Barghusen & Christoph Schulze & Bart van Gorcum, 2021. "Viewpoints on Cooperative Peatland Management: Expectations and Motives of Dutch Farmers," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Huang, Iona Y. & Behrendt, Karl & Parker, Eleanor & Hill, Nigel & Purewal, Amandeep Kaur & Swales, David & Baker, Sarah, 2022. "Ready or not, here I come: Understanding English farmers perceptions of the changes in UK agricultural and environmental policy," 96th Annual Conference, April 4-6, 2022, K U Leuven, Belgium 321210, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    5. Massfeller, Anna & Meraner, Manuela & Hüttel, Silke & Uehleke, Reinhard, 2022. "Farmers' acceptance of results-based agri-environmental schemes: A German perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    6. Artiom Volkov & Mangirdas Morkūnas & Maria Crescimanno, 2025. "Is common agricultural policy competent to steer EU agriculture in turbulent times? Evidence from the European dairy sector," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    7. Nurul Atiqah Binti Mohd Suib & Norlida Hanim Mohd Salleh & Mohd Fazim Ahmad, 2023. "The economic well-being of smallholders and challenges during COVID-19 pandemic: A review," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(1), pages 35-44.
    8. Kihara, Job & Manda, Julius & Kimaro, Anthony & Swai, Elirehema & Mutungi, Christopher & Kinyua, Michael & Okori, Patrick & Fischer, Gundula & Kizito, Fred & Bekunda, Mateete, 2022. "Contributions of integrated soil fertility management (ISFM) to various sustainable intensification impact domains in Tanzania," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    9. Johanna Gather & Meike Wollni, 2022. "Setting the standard: Does Rainforest Alliance Certification increase environmental and socio‐economic outcomes for small‐scale coffee producers in Rwanda?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1807-1825, December.
    10. Otsuka, Keijiro & Jayne, T.S. & Mano, Yukichi & Takahashi, Kazushi, 2024. "Viewpoint: Toward a sustainable Green Revolution in sub-Saharan Africa: The case of maize and rice," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    11. Simone Santalucia & Kibrom T. Sibhatu, 2024. "Nourishing the farms, nourishing the plates: Association of climate‐smart agricultural practices with household dietary diversity and food security in smallholders," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(2), pages 513-533, April.
    12. Roberto Esposti, 2025. "Do rural development policy measures really affect farmers' behaviour and performance? A synthetic difference in differences estimation," Working Papers 494, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    13. Ahmed, Haseeb & Correa, Juan Sebastian & Sitko, Nicholas J., 2025. "Climate adaptation, perceived resilience, and household wellbeing: Comparative evidence from Kenya and Zambia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    14. Marieke Cornelia Baaken & Laure Kuhfuss & Douadia Bougherara & Mikołaj Czajkowski & Macario Rodriguez‐Entrena & Julia Höhler & Carl‐Johan Lagerkvist & Antonio Paparella & Erika Quendler & Jens Rommel , 2025. "Multi‐country perspectives on best practices and barriers to preference elicitation lab‐in‐the‐field experiments with farmers," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(2), pages 723-746, May.
    15. Gang Cui & Zhicheng Liu, 2022. "The Impact of Environmental Regulations and Social Norms on Farmers’ Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Behaviors: An Investigation of Citrus Farmers in Southern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Yikun An & Mohamad Fadhli Rashid & Khairul Hisyam Kamarudin, 2025. "Factors Influencing the Adoption of Intelligent Agriculture Production Technology by Large-Scale Agricultural Growers in Shandong Province, China," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(2), pages 2984-2995, February.
    17. Edoardo Baldoni & Roberto Esposti, 2023. "Estimating The Impact Of Policies Under Spatial Interference. The Case Of Cap Support To Organic Farming," Working Papers 475, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    18. Million Sileshi & Bekele Wegi Feyisa & Shibire Bekele Eshetu & Reuben M.J. Kadigi & Khamaldin Mutabazi & Stefan Sieber, 2024. "Impact of Integrated Soil Fertility Management Practices on the Welfare of Smallholder Farmers in Ethiopia," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 16(6), pages 1445-1457, December.
    19. Mishenin, Yevhen & Koblianska, Inna & Yarova, Inessa & Kovalova, Olha & Bashlai, Serhii, 2023. "Food security, human health, and economy: a holistic approach to sustainable regulation," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(4), December.
    20. Amare, Dagninet & Darr, Dietrich, 2023. "Can a sequential analysis provide a more robust understanding of farmers' adoption decisions? An example from an agroforestry adoption study in Ethiopia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:364293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.