IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/364293.html

Current challenges and complications of organic production and land use in Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Budziak, Olha
  • Budziak, Vasyl

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to assess the impact of conventional farming on organic farming, taking into account modern challenges and complications for making management decisions to ensure sustainable use and long-term conservation of land suitable for organic farming. Methodology / approach. The methodological approach involves the study of the practice of regulating the sustainable use of pesticides by analysing indicators: traditional agriculture (area and volume of pesticide application) and organic (area of organic land) and conducting correlation and regression analysis to identify cause and effect relationships and their dynamics; the basis for the calculation were indicators for the period 2018–2023. Results. It has been established that organic production and land use in accordance with the European Green Deal policy and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development require the sustainable use of pesticides. The data analysis confirmed that more than 90% of usable organic land is involved in the traditional system of cultivation with the use of a full range of pesticides, the volume of which has increased to 1.56 kg/ha on average. The study of the impact of pesticides according to the indicator system during 2018–2023 showed that while at the beginning of the study period the relationship was rather weak, it increased significantly in 2023 with the increase in pesticide use against the background of a sharp decrease in the area of organic land. It is the upward trend in pesticide application that should not be ignored in Vinnytsia, Kyiv, and especially in Ternopil, Ivano-Frankivsk, and Khmelnytsky regions, where pesticide use exceeded 1.8 kg/ha. And given the contamination caused by the war, the land may be transformed from suitable to unsuitable for organic use. The current system requires regulation of sustainable pesticide use in accordance with European standards and the introduction of a mechanism for preventive control of contamination of land potentially suitable for organic farming. Despite the current challenges and complications, Ukrainian organic operators continue to develop organic production, providing Ukraine and the world with high-quality organic products. Originality / scientific novelty. For the first time, the impact of conventional agriculture on organic agriculture was assessed by indicators in dynamics and the regions with potentially suitable organic lands were grouped by the level of pesticide contamination, and the need to regulate the sustainable use of pesticides in order to reduce losses in organic production in the face of climate change was substantiated. Practical value / implications. The results of the study can serve as a basis for the development of strategies for the development of agriculture and rural areas in the context of the regions of Ukraine in terms of regulating the sustainable use of pesticides, to improve soil conditions, product quality and environmental protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Budziak, Olha & Budziak, Vasyl, . "Current challenges and complications of organic production and land use in Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 11(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:364293
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.364293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/364293/files/1_Budziak_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.364293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hörner, Denise & Wollni, Meike, 2021. "Integrated soil fertility management and household welfare in Ethiopia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    2. Skorokhod, Iryna & Skrypchuk, Petro & Shpak, Halyna & Chemerys, Vasyl & Yakubiv, Roman, . "Assessment of efficiency of the organic production development in Western Polissia regions," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(4).
    3. Brown, Calum & Kovács, Eszter & Herzon, Irina & Villamayor-Tomas, Sergio & Albizua, Amaia & Galanaki, Antonia & Grammatikopoulou, Ioanna & McCracken, Davy & Olsson, Johanna Alkan & Zinngrebe, Yves, 2021. "Simplistic understandings of farmer motivations could undermine the environmental potential of the common agricultural policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paulus, Anne & Hagemann, Nina & Baaken, Marieke C. & Roilo, Stephanie & Alarcón-Segura, Viviana & Cord, Anna F. & Beckmann, Michael, 2022. "Landscape context and farm characteristics are key to farmers' adoption of agri-environmental schemes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    2. Nurul Atiqah Binti Mohd Suib & Norlida Hanim Mohd Salleh & Mohd Fazim Ahmad, 2023. "The economic well-being of smallholders and challenges during COVID-19 pandemic: A review," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(1), pages 35-44.
    3. Kihara, Job & Manda, Julius & Kimaro, Anthony & Swai, Elirehema & Mutungi, Christopher & Kinyua, Michael & Okori, Patrick & Fischer, Gundula & Kizito, Fred & Bekunda, Mateete, 2022. "Contributions of integrated soil fertility management (ISFM) to various sustainable intensification impact domains in Tanzania," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    4. Hongyun Zheng & Wanglin Ma & Yanzhi Guo, 2023. "Does nutrition knowledge training improve dietary diversity and nutrition intake? Insights from rural China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(S1), pages 1417-1436, December.
    5. Mishenin, Yevhen & Koblianska, Inna & Yarova, Inessa & Kovalova, Olha & Bashlai, Serhii, 2023. "Food security, human health, and economy: a holistic approach to sustainable regulation," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(4), December.
    6. Amare, Dagninet & Darr, Dietrich, 2023. "Can a sequential analysis provide a more robust understanding of farmers' adoption decisions? An example from an agroforestry adoption study in Ethiopia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    7. Andreea-Emanuela Drăgoi, 2022. "The Role of Common Agricultural Policy for Enhancing the Resilience of Rural Areas under the Current Global Challenges," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 10(2), pages 6-17, December.
    8. Eleni Yitbarek & Wondimagegn Tesfaye, 2022. "Climate-Smart Agriculture, Non-Farm Employment and Welfare: Exploring Impacts and Options for Scaling Up," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Rössert, Sebastian & Gosling, Elizabeth & Gandorfer, Markus & Knoke, Thomas, 2022. "Woodchips or potato chips? How enhancing soil carbon and reducing chemical inputs influence the allocation of cropland," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    10. Barreiro-Hurle, Jesus & Dessart, Francois J. & Rommel, Jens & Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Espinosa-Goded, Maria & Rodriguez-Entrena, Macario & Thomas, Fabian & Zagorska, Katarzyna, 2023. "Willing or complying? The delicate interplay between voluntary and mandatory interventions to promote farmers' environmental behavior," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    11. Andreea-Emanuela Dragoi & Anca-Catalina Dragomir, 2022. "The Role of Common Agricultural Policy in Climate Actions," Global Economic Observer, "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences;Institute for World Economy of the Romanian Academy, vol. 10(1), pages 80-87, June.
    12. Banchayehu Tessema Assefa & Jordan Chamberlin & Martin K. van Ittersum & Pytrik Reidsma, 2021. "Usage and Impacts of Technologies and Management Practices in Ethiopian Smallholder Maize Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Johanna Gather & Meike Wollni, 2022. "Setting the standard: Does Rainforest Alliance Certification increase environmental and socio‐economic outcomes for small‐scale coffee producers in Rwanda?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1807-1825, December.
    14. Will, Meike & Jäger, Felix & Müller, Birgit, 2025. "Farmer decision-making on agri-environmental schemes: An agent-based modelling approach to evaluate different policy designs in Saxony, Germany," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    15. Kelemen, Eszter & Megyesi, Boldizsár & Matzdorf, Bettina & Andersen, Erling & van Bussel, Lenny G.J. & Dumortier, Myriam & Dutilly, Céline & García-Llorente, Marina & Hamon, Christine & LePage, Annabe, 2023. "The prospects of innovative agri-environmental contracts in the European policy context: Results from a Delphi study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    16. Otsuka, Keijiro & Jayne, T.S. & Mano, Yukichi & Takahashi, Kazushi, 2024. "Viewpoint: Toward a sustainable Green Revolution in sub-Saharan Africa: The case of maize and rice," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    17. Bourceret, Amélie & Amblard, Laurence & Mathias, Jean-Denis, 2022. "Adapting the governance of social–ecological systems to behavioural dynamics: An agent-based model for water quality management using the theory of planned behaviour," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    18. Fabian Klebl & Peter H. Feindt & Annette Piorr, 2024. "Farmers’ behavioural determinants of on-farm biodiversity management in Europe: a systematic review," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(2), pages 831-861, June.
    19. Chakravorty, Rwit & Feng, Hongli & Hennessy, David A., 2025. "Tailoring Conservation Policy: Farmer Typologies and Differential Barrier Perceptions in Drainage Practices," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 360738, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Simone Santalucia & Kibrom T. Sibhatu, 2024. "Nourishing the farms, nourishing the plates: Association of climate‐smart agricultural practices with household dietary diversity and food security in smallholders," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(2), pages 513-533, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:364293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.