IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/256392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Еколого-Економічна Оцінка Емісії Со2 З Ґрунтів За Різних Рівнів Антропогенного Навантаження

Author

Listed:
  • Anatoliy, Kucher

Abstract

It is proposed author’s scientific and methodical approach to quantitative economic (monetary) evaluation of the environmental effect from preventing carbon dioxide emissions from the soil of agricultural lands under different levels of anthropogenic pressure. This approach is based on the principles of the theory of natural capital, physical economy theory, methodology of basic (fundamental) monetary evaluation of arable soil, reflecting their potential fertility as a component of natural capital. It is carried out the economic assessment of losses of carbon from chernozems by various methods of the basic soil tillage, fertilization systems and farming systems by influence the potential and effective fertility of the soil and the environment. Comprehensive assessment of different methods of basic soil tillage shows that most cumulative emissions CO2-equivalents with chernozems and from the combustion of diesel fuel causes plowing – 693 kg/ha, second place takes disking – 645 kg/ha, then – cultivation (638 kg/ha), direct seeding has the least emission capacity (634 kg CO2-equivalents/ha) among the studied ways.

Suggested Citation

  • Anatoliy, Kucher, 2016. "Еколого-Економічна Оцінка Емісії Со2 З Ґрунтів За Різних Рівнів Антропогенного Навантаження," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 2(1), March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:256392
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.256392
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/256392/files/4%20%D0%9A%D1%83%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%80_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%82%D1%8F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.256392?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Parmakli, D., 2016. "Прямой И Сопутствующий Эффект Прироста Урожайности: Какой Больше?," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 2(3), September.
    2. Lialina, Nataliia, 2018. "Вплив Інтенсивності Витрат Кормів На Ефективність Молочного Скотарства," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 4(1), March.
    3. Miskova Olena, 2023. "The alien fraction of the flora of Seymskiy Regional Landscape Park, Sumy Oblast, Ukraine," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 58-71, March.
    4. Figurek, A. & Vasković, U., 2017. "Determination of the relationship between outputs and inputs in agriculture in the EU member states," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 3(1), March.
    5. Andreas Kramer, 2016. "Using Experimental Survey Designs to Support Pricing Decisions," Business and Management Horizons, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(1), pages 22-38, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:256392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.