Author
Abstract
The aim of this investigation was to determine the knowledge and adoption levels of scientific date palm cultivation practices among 120 date palm growers. Knowledge was assessed using a structured questionnaire covering 13 major components of cultivation technology. Results showed that growers possessed high knowledge of varietal information, field preparation and planting, intercropping and management of abiotic stresses with knowledge levels ranging from about 65 to 90 percent. In contrast, lower knowledge was observed in critical areas such as insect and pest management, manure and fertilizer management, irrigation, disease management and propagation. Overall, the majority of respondents (62.50 percent) fell into the medium knowledge category, while 20.00 percent had low knowledge and only 17.50 percent demonstrated high knowledge. Adoption analysis revealed a similar pattern. Full adoption was observed for recommended varieties, while relatively higher adoption was recorded for field preparation, intercropping and harvesting practices. However, adoption of plant protection measures, propagation techniques and nutrient management remained low. Most growers (67.50 percent) belonged to the medium adoption category followed by low (18.33 percent) and high (14.16 percent) adoption levels. Correlation analysis indicated a positive and statistically significant relationship between knowledge and adoption, suggesting that increased knowledge leads to better adoption of scientific practices. Further analysis showed that education, experience in date palm cultivation, access to information sources and marketing channels had strong positive associations with both knowledge and adoption.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:402852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.