IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/389073.html

Rice Farmers’ Perception on Subsidized Fertilizer Distribution and Technical Advice on Fertilizer Utilization in Western Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Okech, Joseph Newton O.
  • Ogallo, Leo
  • Ojiem, John
  • Rewe, Mercy
  • Balah, Oyata

Abstract

This study examined farmers perceptions on subsidized fertilizer distribution mechanisms and agricultural extension services in Western Kenya. It sought to determine how the technical guidance influenced the fertilizer use efficiency and system-level obstacles to fair access to inputs. A cross-sectional design and multi-stage sampling were used to survey 480 smallholder rice farmers across rain-fed and irrigated ecosystems in Kisumu and Busia counties between July and October 2024. Structured questionnaires were used in capturing primary data while Secondary data was collected from 13 key informants, including governmental and non-governmental institutions. Data envelopment analysis (DEA), and stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) were employed in analyzing the efficiency of distribution systems and extension services. Findings revealed that 71% of farmers cited corruption in fertilizer distribution, 54% lacked access to subsidized inputs, and others reported inflation (40%) and hoarding (41%). Regarding extension services, 62% had no extension contact, and 43% were advised only once per year. Adoption of new rice varieties was high (72%), only 45% improved post-harvest practices. There was strong support for cooperative-led solutions: group-based input distribution (84%), farmer representation (93%), and bulk purchasing (73%). However, demand-driven extension was perceived as costly (72%) and confusing (63%). Fragmented extension systems and inequitable input distribution were key barriers to fertilizer utilization. The study recommends policy reforms to address corruption, strengthen farmer cooperatives, and promote integrated extension models. Adoption of hybrid extension approaches and technology-driven input systems will be vital in enhancing efficiency and equity in Kenya’s rice sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Okech, Joseph Newton O. & Ogallo, Leo & Ojiem, John & Rewe, Mercy & Balah, Oyata, 2025. "Rice Farmers’ Perception on Subsidized Fertilizer Distribution and Technical Advice on Fertilizer Utilization in Western Kenya," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 43(7).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:389073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/389073/files/Okech4372025AJAEES141606.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, 2022. "Global Economic Prospects, June 2022," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 37224, April.
    2. Jeff Bennett & Ekin Birol (ed.), 2010. "Choice Experiments in Developing Countries," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13208.
    3. Sokvibol Kea & Hua Li & Linvolak Pich, 2016. "Technical Efficiency and Its Determinants of Rice Production in Cambodia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Arouna, Aminou & Michler, Jeffrey D. & Lokossou, Jourdain C., 2021. "Contract farming and rural transformation: Evidence from a field experiment in Benin," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    5. World Bank, 2022. "Global Economic Prospects, January 2022," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 36519, April.
    6. Zhilu Sun & Xiande Li, 2021. "Technical Efficiency of Chemical Fertilizer Use and Its Influencing Factors in China’s Rice Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan D Moyer & Willem Verhagen & Brendan Mapes & David K Bohl & Yutang Xiong & Vivian Yang & Kaylin McNeil & José Solórzano & Mohammod Irfan & Cade Carter & Barry B Hughes, 2022. "How many people is the COVID-19 pandemic pushing into poverty? A long-term forecast to 2050 with alternative scenarios," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(7), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Andree,Bo Pieter Johannes & Pape,Utz Johann, 2023. "Machine Learning Imputation of High Frequency Price Surveys in Papua New Guinea," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10559, The World Bank.
    3. Kim, Won Joong & Ko, Juyoung & Kwon, Won Soon & Piao, Chunyan, 2025. "Time-varying sources of fluctuations in global inflation," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Yi, Eunkyung & Kim, Bongchul & Oztarsu, Mehmet Fatih & Khaustova, Yevheniia & Yatsenko, Hanna, 2025. "Optimisation of international financial institutions: A comparative analysis of Ukraine and South Korea’s roles in enhancing global economic stability," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    5. Hamilton, Calumn & de Vries, Gaaitzen J., 2025. "The structural transformation of transition economies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    6. Hugo G. Hidalgo & Tosiyuki Nakaegawa & David Romero & Eric J. Alfaro & Tito Maldonado & Yukiko Imada & Kohei Yoshida, 2025. "How rare was the 2016–2022 tropical cyclone activity near the Caribbean coasts of Nicaragua and Costa Rica?," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(13), pages 15899-15923, July.
    7. Olamide Ebenezer G & Daisi, F.T., 2025. "A Multivariate Analysis of Variance Approach to Business Success Factors of SMEs in Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(14), pages 161-173, January.
    8. repec:ocp:ppaper:pb18-22 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Anaïs Vibranovski, 2022. "A complementary cash transfer programme to mitigate the socioeconomic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on children in Tunisia: What are the lessons learned for the development of human capital?," Policy Research Brief 90, International Policy Centre.
    10. Yamey, Gavin & Bharali, Ipchita & Ogbuoji, Osondu, 2025. "Can development assistance for health mutually benefit donors and recipient countries?," Kiel Working Papers 2306, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    11. Noel Nthangu & Mulatu Zerihun & Mushoni Bulagi, 2025. "The Socioeconomic determinants of foreign capital inflows in selected Sub-Saharan African Countries," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 7(2), pages 307-318, April.
    12. Mark Shevlin & Enya Redican & Philip Hyland & Sarah Butter & Orla McBride & Todd K Hartman & Jamie Murphy & Frédérique Vallières & Richard P Bentall, 2022. "Perceived manageability of debt and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A UK population analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-13, September.
    13. Arroyo Marioli,Francisco & Vegh,Carlos A., 2023. "Fiscal Procyclicality in Commodity Exporting Countries : How Much Does It Pour andWhy ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10428, The World Bank.
    14. Li Yuan & Xun Fan & Jing Xu & Haidong Wang, 2025. "A Study on the Intergenerational Distribution of Ecological Values of Cultivated Land: A Case of Lezhi County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-30, June.
    15. Georgakas, Ioannis, 2025. "Support Policies and Inflationary Pressures: A Critical Review of 2020-2022 in the Light of the 2008 Experience," MPRA Paper 124405, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Tugume, Moses & Ibrahim, Mona G. & Nasr, Mahmoud, 2025. "Valorization of cheese whey wastewater to achieve sustainable development goals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    17. Xenarios, Stefanos & Amarasinghe, Upali A. & Sharma, Bharat R., 2011. "Valuating agricultural water use and ecological services in agrarian economies: evidences from eastern India," IWMI Reports 158839, International Water Management Institute.
    18. Khan, Mohammed Tajuddin & Kishore, Avinash & Joshi, Pramod K., 2016. "Gender dimensions on farmers’ preferences for direct-seeded rice with drum seeder in India," IFPRI discussion papers 1550, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    19. Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu & Henrik Andersson & Olivier Beaumais & Romain Crastes dit Sourd & Stephane Hess & François-Charles Wolf, 2017. "Stated preferences: a unique database composed of 1657recent published articles in journals relatedto agriculture, environment, or health," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 98(3), pages 201-220.
    20. Gabriela Scheufele & Jeff Bennett, 2011. "Valuing ecosystem resilience," Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports 1098, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    21. Ulf Liebe & Ismaïl M. Moumouni & Christine Bigler & Chantal Ingabire & Sabin Bieri, 2020. "Using Factorial Survey Experiments to Measure Attitudes, Social Norms, and Fairness Concerns in Developing Countries," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(1), pages 161-192, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:389073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.