IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/367305.html

An Experimental Study to Analyse the Effectiveness of Programmed Instruction in Educating Agricultural Subject on Affective Domain of Extension Functionaries

Author

Listed:
  • Manjula, N.
  • Nagaraja, N.
  • Chandregowda, M. J.
  • Reddy, M. V. Srinivasa
  • Kumar, T. P. Bharath

Abstract

An experimental study was conducted to explore the potentiality of Programmed Instruction (PI) as an educational method in bringing desirable changes in the affective domain of extension functionaries on new agriculture technology, using Solomon four group research design: before-after with three controls considering 120 respondents. The results revealed that, the PI was more effective at organisation sub-domain (51.00) followed by valuing (42.87), responding to phenomena (39.60), receiving phenomena (38.00) and internalising values (35.33). The overall effectiveness score of affective domain was 41.36 signifying that, the PI is an effective educational method.

Suggested Citation

  • Manjula, N. & Nagaraja, N. & Chandregowda, M. J. & Reddy, M. V. Srinivasa & Kumar, T. P. Bharath, 2022. "An Experimental Study to Analyse the Effectiveness of Programmed Instruction in Educating Agricultural Subject on Affective Domain of Extension Functionaries," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 40(11), pages 1-7.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:367305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/367305/files/Manjula40112023AJAEES98643.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:367305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.