IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/367089.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study on Knowledge Level of Paddy Growers about Natural Farming and Conventional Farming practices

Author

Listed:
  • Dandolu, Jyothsna
  • Balasubramaniam, P.

Abstract

The study was conducted in natural and conventional crop fields in the Nellore district of Andhra Pradesh spanning one block and involving 120 sample respondents, Sixty farmers practised natural farming practises and the other 60 practiced conventional farming To select 30 farmers from each hamlet, a purposive sample strategy was used. The data was collected using a well-structured interview schedule, with the primary goal of determining paddy growers' knowledge of natural and conventional farming approaches. In the Naidupeta block, paddy is a key crop. The study found that the majority (48.3 percent) of respondents had a medium level of knowledge of natural farming practices, followed by high and low levels of knowledge of conventional farming practices, and that the majority (60.0 percent) of respondents had a medium level of knowledge on natural farming practices, followed by low and high levels of knowledge on conventional farming practices. Farmers' understanding of natural and conventional paddy farming methods would aid in the development of appropriate measures to strengthen the practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Dandolu, Jyothsna & Balasubramaniam, P., 2022. "A Comparative Study on Knowledge Level of Paddy Growers about Natural Farming and Conventional Farming practices," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 40(10), pages 1-5.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:367089
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/367089/files/sciencedomain%2C%2BDandolu40102022AJAEES89150.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:367089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.