IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/366898.html

Assessment of the Power Relations among Strategic Actors in the Sesame Value Chain in Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Mhagama, Joseph Kizito
  • Mmasa, Joel Johnson

Abstract

This study assessed power relations among actors in the sesame value chain in Tanzania. The study employed cross-sectional research design, whereas a sample 58 Agricultural Marketing Cooperative Societies (AMCOS) was randomly drawn through probability sampling techniques. Data were collected using survey questionnaire, focus group discussions and key informants interviews and analysed using descriptive analysis. The study found that AMCOS positively influence power relations among actors in the sesame value chain. Further, the study revealed that capacity of sesame AMCOS in Lindi and Mtwara is low and policy framework guiding the sesame sub-sector is weak, hence paving way to middlemen (chomachoma) dominancy, poor operation of Warehouse Receipt System (WHRS) and low productivity. It was further eminent that demographic factors; age, education, sex, income and non-farm activities are important factors on the performance of actors in the chain. The sub-sector map shows sesame products currently flowing via several alternative supply paths; from farm to various end market consumers in Tanzania and abroad. The data unveiled six primary channels or supply paths operating within the regions. The study concluded that dominance of uncoordinated and unregulated middlemen in the sesame value chain as well as heavy involvement of UNIONS and government in the marketing of sesame is the direct effect of weak support services provided by AMCOS resulting from lack of policy framework to guide the sub-sector. The Study recommends strengthening institutional and technical capacity of the sesame AMCOS and improving policy environment to allow the sub-sector to thrive and benefit its stakeholders, majority of who are resource poor smallholder farmers.

Suggested Citation

  • Mhagama, Joseph Kizito & Mmasa, Joel Johnson, 2022. "Assessment of the Power Relations among Strategic Actors in the Sesame Value Chain in Tanzania," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 40(1), pages 1-17.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:366898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/366898/files/Mhagama4012021AJAEES80962.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John W. Mellor, 2017. "Agricultural Development and Economic Transformation," Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-3-319-65259-7, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano & Jelliffe, Jeremy & Hoekman, Bernard, 2024. "Agri-food value chains and the global food dollar: The role of trade and services," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    2. Peter Warr, 2023. "Productivity in Indonesian agriculture: Impacts of domestic and international research," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(3), pages 835-856, September.
    3. Neema Ciza Angélique & Vwima Stany & Philippe Lebailly & Hossein Azadi, 2022. "Agricultural Development in the Fight against Poverty: The Case of South Kivu, DR Congo," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Andrey Baldanov & Lily Kiminami & Shinichi Furuzawa, 2019. "Study on the relationships between rural and agricultural development and human resource development in Russian Federation since 2000s," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 87-100, August.
    5. Ameye, Hannah & De Weerdt, Joachim, 2020. "Child health across the rural–urban spectrum," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    6. R. B. Radin Firdaus & Andrew Ebekozien & Mohamad Shaharudin Samsurijan & Hafizi Rosli, 2024. "What Drives the Young Malaysian Generation to Become Horticulture Farmers? A Qualitative Approach," Millennial Asia, , vol. 15(3), pages 465-486, September.
    7. Rajni Kapoor & Nimai Das, 2021. "A Pragmatic Study for Enhancing Agricultural Efficiency through Labor Freedom," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(4), pages 279-290.
    8. Arya, Aziz R., . "Agricultural Transformation in Asia: Experiences and Emerging Challenges," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 19(2).
    9. Khan, Iqrar Ahmad, 2021. "Rural-Urban Transition: A Challenge to Agricultural Productivity, Biodiversity and Food Security in Pakistan," ICDD Working Papers 37, University of Kassel, Fachbereich Gesellschaftswissenschaften (Social Sciences), Internatioanl Center for Development and Decent Work (ICDD).
    10. Akhter U. Ahmed & Salauddin Tauseef, 2022. "Climbing up the Ladder and Watching Out for the Fall: Poverty Dynamics in Rural Bangladesh," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 160(1), pages 309-340, February.
    11. William J. Burke & Sieglinde S. Snapp & Thom S. Jayne, 2020. "An in‐depth examination of maize yield response to fertilizer in Central Malawi reveals low profits and too many weeds," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(6), pages 923-940, November.
    12. Ghislain Aihounton & Luc Christiaensen, 2023. "Does Agricultural Intensification Pay?," World Bank Publications - Reports 39701, The World Bank Group.
    13. Iqra Mohiuddin & Muhammad Asif Kamran & Shokhrukh-Mirzo Jalilov & Mobin-ud-Din Ahmad & Sultan Ali Adil & Raza Ullah & Tasneem Khaliq, 2020. "Scale and Drivers of Female Agricultural Labor: Evidence from Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-15, August.
    14. Khorana, Sangeeta & Yeung, May T., . "Structural Change, Trade and Development: Agrifood and Aquaculture in Bangladesh," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 24(2).
    15. Aihounton, Ghislain & Christiaensen, Luc, 2024. "Does agricultural intensification pay in the context of structural transformation?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    16. Thoto, Frejus & Mas Aparisi, Alban & Derlagen, Christian, "undated". "An ecosystemic framework for analysing evidence-informed policy systems for agricultural transformation – Case study of Benin," ESA Working Papers 330800, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
    17. Peter Timmer, 2018. "Pro-poor growth in Indonesia: Challenging the pessimism of Myrdal's Asian Drama," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2018-103, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Syahrul Yasin Limpo & Imam Mujahidin Fahmid & Abdul Fattah & Abdul Wahid Rauf & Elza Surmaini & Muslimin & Saptana & Haris Syahbuddin & Kuntoro Boga Andri, 2022. "Integrating Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge for Decision Making of Rice Farming in South Sulawesi, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Mellor, J., 2018. "Recent findings about agriculture and the economic transformation," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 276971, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Hall Hill, 2017. "Southeast Asia in the global economy: a selective analytical survey," Philippine Review of Economics, University of the Philippines School of Economics and Philippine Economic Society, vol. 54(2), pages 1-36, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:366898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.