IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/357544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Social Barriers Constraining Increased Breadfruit Tree Cultivation in Southeast Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Enibe, David Okechukwu

Abstract

The study analysed the social barriers constraining increased breadfruit (Treculia africana) planting in Southeast Nigeria. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire administered on 260 respondents selected through a simple random sampling process from 13 communities in Anambra and Enugu States of Southeast Nigeria. From the respondents, 4 in-depth interviews were conducted for more detailed information and verification of some answers in the questionnaire. Data were realised with descriptive statistics. The results reveal that significant proportion (52%) of the farmers had certain beliefs about the crop, but that the beliefs that the crop is not meant to be cultivated, planted by young people and others are unlikely to be significant reasons for its limited planting. The result, however, indicates that systems norm of free fruit head collection (32.14%) is likely to be a significant reason for the limited planting of the trees in the farm fields of some communities in the study area. The result suggests that the norm may be a barrier to using the crop for climate stress adaptation in those communities. The study, therefore, recommends that proactive measures such as holistic education and awareness programmes should be employed by change agencies to overcome breadfruit planting social barriers.

Suggested Citation

  • Enibe, David Okechukwu, 2018. "Analysis of the Social Barriers Constraining Increased Breadfruit Tree Cultivation in Southeast Nigeria," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 28(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:357544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/357544/files/Enibe2832018AJAEES44833.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:357544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.