IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/356959.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Re-formulating Land and Resource Management Policies: Devolving Decision-making Power to Local Communities in China and Mongolia

Author

Listed:
  • Squires, Victor R.
  • Feng, Haiying

Abstract

This is a brief overview of the issues surrounding the concept and application of devolution of decision-making in the context of rural peoples in two Asian countries. The mechanics of devolution (the how, why and what) are discussed as well as the instruments of devolution. Three case studies are presented to illustrate the experience of local people trying to deal with intense competition for limited resources. China provides two case studies, the first about village-level rangeland management in an environmentally sensitive catchment of a major tributary to the Yellow River in Qinghai and the second relates to experience with Water User Associations in the river basins of the Hexi Corridor in Gansu. Mongolia provides the third Case study. It deals with legislative reform for grassland and rangeland management and the role of Pasture User Groups in self-management of the precious grazing and water resources so vital to the herdsmen.

Suggested Citation

  • Squires, Victor R. & Feng, Haiying, 2018. "Re-formulating Land and Resource Management Policies: Devolving Decision-making Power to Local Communities in China and Mongolia," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 25(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:356959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/356959/files/Squires2522018AJAEES41369.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:356959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.