IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/10123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What do we mean when we say casualisation of farm work is rising?: Evidence from fruit farms in the Western Cape

Author

Listed:
  • Conradie, Beatrice

Abstract

Du Toit & Ally's (2003) results on the casualisation of farm work in the Western Cape confirmed the worst fears of sociologists: Globalisation and/or labour laws increased casualisation in agriculture. New labour data and a study conducted in 1976 allow one to revisit the casualisation result for the table grape industry of the Hex River Valley. This paper resolves imprecise definitions of regular versus permanent status, and of casual versus seasonal status. It also examines casualisation and job shedding. Results show a decrease in the share of seasonal work and no change in the casual component of seasonal work. The job status of most farm women in the Valley improved as a result of legislative changes implemented since 1994. Outsourcing is present but insignificant at this point. On the whole data for the table grape industry of the Hex River Valley does not support the hypothesis that globalisation and labour market reform caused dramatic increases in casualisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Conradie, Beatrice, 2007. "What do we mean when we say casualisation of farm work is rising?: Evidence from fruit farms in the Western Cape," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 46(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:10123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/10123
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nattrass, Nicoli & Conradie, Beatrice & Conradie, Inge, 2015. "The Koup fencing project: Community-led job creation in the Karoo," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 10(2), June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:10123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.