IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/abajal/336274.html

Commodity marketing: A lenders and producers guide to better risk management

Author

Listed:
  • Schap, Keith

Abstract

While bankers are properly concerned with activities that could threaten safety and soundness, misconceptions about the risk management role of futures and options can impede prudent banker behavior. Successful risk management requires careful communication among loan officers, customers, and top managers, A thorough awareness of risk management and market dynamics can help clarify the difference between speculation and hedging. In rating major financial institutions, for example, Standard & Poors Credit Rating department looks for a sound management program with ample systems and controls in place to manage the risk. In rating mutual funds, S&P gives higher ratings to those funds that use exchange-traded futures and options to manage interest rate risk. Likewise, the Bank for International Settlements regards futures as relatively safe with regard to credit risk. Overall, lenders must balance concerns for liability stemming from malfunctioning hedges and liability for failing to consider the potential benefits of hedging.

Suggested Citation

  • Schap, Keith, 1993. "Commodity marketing: A lenders and producers guide to better risk management," American Bankers Association, American Bankers Association > Journal of Agricultural Lending, vol. 7(01).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:abajal:336274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/336274/files/ers2022-23-0227.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:abajal:336274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.aba.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.