IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aaeatr/397850.html

Student Reflections on Problem-Based Learning: The Use of Open Research Calls in Problem Design

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly, Edel
  • Russell, Tomás

Abstract

While assessment is a necessary part of teaching and learning, how we assess is more flexible. This article demonstrates how using open research calls to design group-based assessment, implemented using the Problem-Based Learning (PBL) approach, enhances the student experience and learning. Data were captured through feedback surveys from final-year undergraduate agricultural science students taking a Food and Agribusiness Strategy module. Student reflections focused on ranking their preferences and perceived learning benefits of various assessment types along with brief justifications for rankings. The overall experience with PBL was captured qualitatively. Findings indicate that the PBL improved engagement and peer-to-peer learning; students were motivated to learn and develop skills they identified as relevant for their future careers. Academics are well positioned to use research calls to design assessments and implement active learning strategies, such as PBL, to structure learning. This approach presents an opportunity for academics to challenge students to engage with real-life problems in a supported environment. Students described the approach as empowering and insightful. The positive sentiment and meaningful engagement experienced by the students were reflected in greater perceived learning benefits and a clear preference for PBL compared to other approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly, Edel & Russell, Tomás, 2026. "Student Reflections on Problem-Based Learning: The Use of Open Research Calls in Problem Design," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 8(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:397850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/397850/files/AETR_2025_0267%20Final%20Proof%20Kelly%20and%20Russell.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:397850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.