IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aaeatr/384749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond the Textbook: Students’ Experiences Learning Agricultural Policy with an AI Tutor

Author

Listed:
  • Huber, Robert
  • Mihálka, Réka

Abstract

This study explores the integration of an AI-powered tutor into agricultural policy education at ETH Zürich to enhance the learning experience and provide insights into AI tools in higher education. Based on a large language model (ChatGPT-4.0), the AI tutor was designed to facilitate interactive learning about agricultural policy, specifically tailored to a textbook on Swiss agricultural policy. It provided functionalities such as concept clarification, summaries, knowledge tests, and open-ended discussions for undergraduate students. Over the course of the semester, 15 students used the tutor independently and for exam preparation. Analysis of student interactions revealed that 79 percent of the tutor’s use was for explaining and clarifying concepts, while 9 percent was for summaries and 4 percent for assessments. Students rated their overall satisfaction with the tutor as 3.8 out of 5 and perceived it as a supplementary learning tool. The results provide insights into the benefits, challenges, and ethical considerations of AI in education and highlight the potential for broader applications in other courses. The study contributes to the discourse on AI in higher education and guides the development and integration of AI-enhanced learning tools to improve student engagement and learning outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Huber, Robert & Mihálka, Réka, 2025. "Beyond the Textbook: Students’ Experiences Learning Agricultural Policy with an AI Tutor," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 7(5), November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:384749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/384749/files/AETR_2025_0263%20Full.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:384749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.