IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aaeatr/384749.html

Beyond the Textbook: Students’ Experiences Learning Agricultural Policy with an AI Tutor

Author

Listed:
  • Huber, Robert
  • Mihálka, Réka

Abstract

This study explores the integration of an AI-powered tutor into agricultural policy education at ETH Zürich to enhance the learning experience and provide insights into AI tools in higher education. Based on a large language model (ChatGPT-4.0), the AI tutor was designed to facilitate interactive learning about agricultural policy, specifically tailored to a textbook on Swiss agricultural policy. It provided functionalities such as concept clarification, summaries, knowledge tests, and open-ended discussions for undergraduate students. Over the course of the semester, 15 students used the tutor independently and for exam preparation. Analysis of student interactions revealed that 79 percent of the tutor’s use was for explaining and clarifying concepts, while 9 percent was for summaries and 4 percent for assessments. Students rated their overall satisfaction with the tutor as 3.8 out of 5 and perceived it as a supplementary learning tool. The results provide insights into the benefits, challenges, and ethical considerations of AI in education and highlight the potential for broader applications in other courses. The study contributes to the discourse on AI in higher education and guides the development and integration of AI-enhanced learning tools to improve student engagement and learning outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Huber, Robert & Mihálka, Réka, 2025. "Beyond the Textbook: Students’ Experiences Learning Agricultural Policy with an AI Tutor," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 7(5), November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:384749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/384749/files/AETR_2025_0263%20Full.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander Bick & Adam Blandin & David Deming, 2023. "The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI," On the Economy 98843, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyunso Kim & Hyo Kang & Jaeyong Song, 2026. "Generative AI Fuels Solo Entrepreneurship, but Teams Still Lead at the Top," Papers 2605.10291, arXiv.org.
    2. Fiedler, Alexandra & Döpke, Jörg, 2025. "Do humans identify AI-generated text better than machines? Evidence based on excerpts from German theses☆," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    3. Jung Ho Choi & Chloe L. Xie, 2026. "Human + AI in Accounting: Early Evidence from the Field," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 64(3), pages 1333-1373, June.
    4. Zara Contractor & Germ'an Reyes, 2025. "Generative AI in Higher Education: Evidence from an Elite College," Papers 2508.00717, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    5. Kathryn Bonney & Cory L. Breaux & Emin Dinlersoz & Lucia S. Foster & John C. Haltiwanger & Aditya A. Pande, 2026. "The Microstructure of AI Diffusion: Evidence from Firms, Business Functions, and Worker Tasks," NBER Working Papers 35141, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Michael Blank & Gregor Schubert & Miao Ben Zhang, 2026. "The Household Impact of Generative AI: Evidence from Internet Browsing Behavior," Papers 2603.03144, arXiv.org.
    7. Fabian Kosse & Tim Leffler & Arna Woemmel, 2025. "Digital Skills: Social Disparities and the Impact of Early Mentoring," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1222, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    8. James Bono, 2025. "Randomized Controlled Trials for Phishing Triage Agent," Papers 2511.13860, arXiv.org.
    9. Greene, Kevin T. & Shapiro, Jacob N, 2026. "Systematic Evaluation of Nation-State Propaganda in LLM Outputs," SocArXiv 57buw_v1, Center for Open Science.
    10. Jacob Dominski & Yong Suk Lee, 2025. "Advancing AI Capabilities and Evolving Labor Outcomes," Papers 2507.08244, arXiv.org.
    11. repec:osf:osfxxx:h6a7c_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Qiaoni Shi & Kai Zhu & Kai Gu, 2026. "Answering Without Referring: How AI Search Rewrites the Web's Economic Bargain," Papers 2607.07652, arXiv.org.
    13. Aaron Chatterji & Daniel Rock & Eduard Talamas, 2025. "Transformative AI and Firms," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Transformative AI, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Konstantinos Pouliakas & Giulia Santangelo & Paul Dupire, 2025. "Are artificial intelligence skills a reward or a gamble? Deconstructing the AI wage premium in Europe," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 1091-1128, December.
    15. Wang, Ping & Wong, Tsz-Nga, 2026. "Artificial intelligence and technological unemployment," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    16. Liu, Yan & Wang, He & Yu, Shu, 2025. "Labor Demand in the Age of Generative AI : Early Evidence from the U.S. Job Posting Data," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11263, The World Bank.
    17. Burhan Ogut & Michelle Yin, 2026. "Partial Identification with Multiple Nonlinear Measurements of a Latent Regressor," Papers 2607.12219, arXiv.org.
    18. James Bono & Beibei Cheng & Joaquin Lozano, 2025. "Randomized Controlled Trials for Conditional Access Optimization Agent," Papers 2511.13865, arXiv.org.
    19. Sugat Chaturvedi & Rochana Chaturvedi, 2025. "Who Gets the Callback? Generative AI and Gender Bias," Papers 2504.21400, arXiv.org.
    20. Liu, Yan & Huang, Jingyun & Wang, He, 2025. "Who on Earth Is Using Generative AI ? Global Trends and Shifts in 2025," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11231, The World Bank.
    21. Melanie Arntz & Myriam Baum & Eduard Brüll & Ralf Dorau & Matthias Hartwig & Britta Matthes & Sophie-Charlotte Meyer & Oliver Schlenker & Anita Tisch & Sascha Wischniewski, 2025. "Low Barriers, High Stakes: Formal and Informal Diffusion of AI in the Workplace," ifo Working Paper Series 422, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:384749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.