IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aaeatr/384749.html

Beyond the Textbook: Students’ Experiences Learning Agricultural Policy with an AI Tutor

Author

Listed:
  • Huber, Robert
  • Mihálka, Réka

Abstract

This study explores the integration of an AI-powered tutor into agricultural policy education at ETH Zürich to enhance the learning experience and provide insights into AI tools in higher education. Based on a large language model (ChatGPT-4.0), the AI tutor was designed to facilitate interactive learning about agricultural policy, specifically tailored to a textbook on Swiss agricultural policy. It provided functionalities such as concept clarification, summaries, knowledge tests, and open-ended discussions for undergraduate students. Over the course of the semester, 15 students used the tutor independently and for exam preparation. Analysis of student interactions revealed that 79 percent of the tutor’s use was for explaining and clarifying concepts, while 9 percent was for summaries and 4 percent for assessments. Students rated their overall satisfaction with the tutor as 3.8 out of 5 and perceived it as a supplementary learning tool. The results provide insights into the benefits, challenges, and ethical considerations of AI in education and highlight the potential for broader applications in other courses. The study contributes to the discourse on AI in higher education and guides the development and integration of AI-enhanced learning tools to improve student engagement and learning outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Huber, Robert & Mihálka, Réka, 2025. "Beyond the Textbook: Students’ Experiences Learning Agricultural Policy with an AI Tutor," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 7(5), November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:384749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/384749/files/AETR_2025_0263%20Full.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander Bick & Adam Blandin & David Deming, 2023. "The Rapid Adoption of Generative AI," On the Economy 98843, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zara Contractor & Germ'an Reyes, 2025. "Generative AI in Higher Education: Evidence from an Elite College," Papers 2508.00717, arXiv.org.
    2. Anastasios Evgenidis & Apostolos Fasianos, 2025. "AI news shocks and the macroeconomy: evidence from UK patent data," IFS Working Papers W25/48, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    3. Cagno, Daniela Di & Lin, Lihui, 2025. "How do individuals interact with an AI advisor in strategic reasoning? An experimental study in beauty contest," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    4. Kiran Tomlinson & Sonia Jaffe & Will Wang & Scott Counts & Siddharth Suri, 2025. "Working with AI: Measuring the Applicability of Generative AI to Occupations," Papers 2507.07935, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    5. Leonardo Gambacorta & Tullio Jappelli & Tommaso Oliviero, 2025. "Exploring household adoption and usage of generative AI: new evidence from Italy," BIS Working Papers 1298, Bank for International Settlements.
    6. Jacob Dominski & Yong Suk Lee, 2025. "Advancing AI Capabilities and Evolving Labor Outcomes," Papers 2507.08244, arXiv.org.
    7. repec:osf:osfxxx:h6a7c_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Aaron Chatterji & Daniel Rock & Eduard Talamàs, 2025. "Transformative AI and Firms," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Transformative AI, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Liu, Yan & Wang, He & Yu, Shu, 2025. "Labor Demand in the Age of Generative AI : Early Evidence from the U.S. Job Posting Data," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11263, The World Bank.
    10. Bertomeu, Jeremy & Lin, Yupeng & Liu, Yibin & Ni, Zhenghui, 2025. "The impact of generative AI on information processing: Evidence from the ban of ChatGPT in Italy," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(1).
    11. Zara Contractor & Germán Reyes, 2025. "Generative AI in Higher Education: Evidence from an Elite College," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0359, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    12. Piyush Gulati & Arianna Marchetti & Phanish Puranam & Victoria Sevcenko, 2025. "Generative AI Adoption and Higher Order Skills," Papers 2503.09212, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    13. Henry A. Thompson, 2026. "AI and the Law," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(1), pages 70-82, February.
    14. Fabian Kosse & Tim Leffler & Arna Woemmel, 2025. "Digital Skills: Social Disparities and the Impact of Early Mentoring," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1222, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    15. James Bono & Alec Xu, 2024. "Randomized Controlled Trials for Security Copilot for IT Administrators," Papers 2411.01067, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    16. Fiedler, Alexandra & Döpke, Jörg, 2025. "Do humans identify AI-generated text better than machines? Evidence based on excerpts from German theses☆," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    17. James Bono, 2025. "Randomized Controlled Trials for Phishing Triage Agent," Papers 2511.13860, arXiv.org.
    18. James Bono & Beibei Cheng & Joaquin Lozano, 2025. "Randomized Controlled Trials for Conditional Access Optimization Agent," Papers 2511.13865, arXiv.org.
    19. Sugat Chaturvedi & Rochana Chaturvedi, 2025. "Who Gets the Callback? Generative AI and Gender Bias," Papers 2504.21400, arXiv.org.
    20. Liu, Yan & Huang, Jingyun & Wang, He, 2025. "Who on Earth Is Using Generative AI ? Global Trends and Shifts in 2025," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11231, The World Bank.
    21. Melanie Arntz & Myriam Baum & Eduard Brüll & Ralf Dorau & Matthias Hartwig & Britta Matthes & Sophie-Charlotte Meyer & Oliver Schlenker & Anita Tisch & Sascha Wischniewski, 2025. "Low Barriers, High Stakes: Formal and Informal Diffusion of AI in the Workplace," ifo Working Paper Series 422, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:384749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.